One for two: Africa has two species of elephants

If at high school biology you were taught that there are two species of elephants — the African and the Asian —it’s time to forget that.

A new research shows that the “African elephant” is actually two species. These two species are as evolutionarily different as goat and sheep are from one another. It’s a surprising degree of divergence that has just been reported.

The study, published in this week’s issue of the journal PLoS Biology was conducted by teams from Harvard, the University of Illinois and the University of York in Britain. The evolutionary divergence was identified by analyzing the DNA of the living elephant species and two of their extinct evolutionary cousins, the woolly mammoth and mastodon.

The study suggests the species separated several million years ago, about the same time that humans diverged from chimps.

The forest elephant is smaller, and is sometimes referred to as the “dwarf African elephant,” standing at about 8.2 feet high compared with the savanna elephant’s 11.5 feet, and weighing about half as much. The forest elephant also has straighter tusks and oval-shaped ears.

The savanna elephant weighs between 6 and 7 tons, roughly double the weight of the forest elephant.

The African elephant is listed as endangered by the U.S. Endangered Species Act, and splitting the population into two different species places the forest elephant in much more dreadful category.

Share

It might be love


From where I come, falling in love it tough. In fact, in most cases, you don’t even know you have fallen in love. It’s different where I live now. It is easy to love in love at the grocery checkout or gas station.

Celebrities are infamous for falling in at incredible speed, and falling out even quicker. There is a saying in my local language that translates into, “haste makes waste”. It means literally what you read.

I’ve cannot recall most of the high profile celebrities in Africa so permit me to use examples from where I live. Any way, readers from Nigeria, Ghana, Tanzania and other African countries perhaps know these people more than I do.

Rihanna and Chris Brown, Madonna and Guy Ritchie,Jon and Kate Gosselin, Jessica Simpson and Tony Romo, Tiger Woods, Bristol Plain and Levi Johnson, Antwaun Cook, Christina Milian, Fantasia, Antwaun Cook, Amber Rose and even Kanye West. What is that is common with all these folks. These are singers, actors and actresses, and athletes. The one thing that unites all of them is that they knew how to fall in and fall out of love quickly.

Well, the truth is, it is not a celebrity phenomenon. All of us do run into it. Some of us are lucky we aren’t significant enough to have our stories on the cover of the National Enquirer. When that kind of feeling is so fresh and ‘feely’, attempting to apply algebra to the situation is just nonsense. There is what feels right, and then what is right, but when you’re in that ‘feely’ mode, what feels right always wins.

So how to you know you or someone is falling in love too quickly?

Below are some red lights:

1. Everyone is telling you that you are moving way too fast.

If your close friends or family — the people who know you best — think you’re rushing into things, they just may be on to something. Listen to the people you trust the most; they have your best interest in mind.

2. You fell in love over a vacation.

You were all in your best moods, you had the trendiest attire, and just perfect in all sense. Hei, the time the two of you spent together was extraordinary. But remember that ‘that feely’ feeling is usually transient.


3. You don’t know each other’s full name.

If you’re like that friend of mine who could not pronounce at the fiancée full name during the wedding rehearsal, you’re surely running too quickly. That is probably fine if you’re looking for a room-mate, but for lifetime partner? I’m afraid you are just too fast. I’ve got to go to bed now but feel free to add some more red lights in the comment form. Others will surely benefit from your wisdom

4.  

5.  

6.

7.

8.

Share

Eradication of malaria is within reach, WHO reports

Picture from Roll Back Malaria
Picture from Roll Back Malaria

The World Health Organization, the UN agency which over ten years ago started a campaign to cut the number of malaria cases and deaths in half by 2010, reports that Malaria is fast declining in countries where it had been endemic.

Just five years ago, the anti-malaria campaign was in such poor shape that this news from the UN agency is surprising and gladdens the hearts of both researchers and residents of regions prone to malaria.

Even though experts agree that the campaign will fall short of meeting the goals it set over a decade ago, significant progress has been made over the past few years in distributing the means to prevent and treat malaria and in bringing down death rates in many countries.

As a result, malaria-related deaths have also fallen globally from 985,000 in 2000 to 781,000 in 2009, with most of the deaths registered in children under five. In short, the anti-malaria campaign efforts are saving around 204 000 lives per year right now over the baseline in 2000.

In Uganda, for instance, the report shows that the number of households owning at least one insecticide-treated mosquito net has increased over the last two years from 42 to 47 per cent.

Over the past three to four years, millions of insecticide-treated bed nets have been delivered to sub-Saharan Africa. The number of people whose houses were protected by insecticide spraying jumped to 75 million in 2009, protecting another 10 percent of the population at risk.

The most encouraging news is that experts say that with continued effort, the number of malaria deaths could be halved by the end of 2011 and practically eliminated by 2015.

We posted an article here on November 7th 2010 with the title ‘Eradicating malaria in Sub-Saharan Africa, Yes We Can’

How ‘prophetic’ we were.

We actually can.

Share

“Sleeping beauty’ and societal implications

What does Kobe has to worry about?
What does Kobe has to worry about?

The key to looking attractive and healthy is simpler than you will imagine: it’s all in a ‘good sleep’, a new scientific research suggests.

The idea of ‘beauty sleep’ was an ancient myth but now experts say they have uncovered the first scientific backing for the concept.

The team of researchers from the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, recruited 23 healthy adults aged 18 to 31.  The volunteers were photographed after eight hours sleep and again after being kept awake for 31 hours.
The photographs were standardised, meaning the people were the same distance from the camera, wore no make-up and wore the same expression.

The pictures were then presented in a random order to 65 untrained observers.  The observers were asked to rank the participants on a scale according to how healthy, attractive or sleep-deprived they looked.

The results: The observers scored the sleep-deprived participants as less healthy and less attractive while the volunteers who had adequate sleep were ranked the opposite: healthier and more attractive.

The result is published in the British Medical Journal.

Conclusion: Humans are sensitive to sleep-related facial cues, with potential implications for social and clinical judgments and behavior.

My personal commentary:

Whether it is the University student’s apprehension about a pending examination, or the petty trader’s anxiety about the economy, sleep debt is a major problem in most hard-pressed economies such as those in Africa.

If not dealt with, an escalating sleep debt can result in fibromyalgia syndrome, also called chronic fatigue syndrome. This syndrome leads to prevalent pain and fatigue of just about any muscle in the body. Usually, it brings about other forms of psychological conflicts like depression disorders.

In fact, losing sleep can even have negative consequences for your heart health. Heightened risk of cardiovascular diseases and mortality has been associated with sleep debt.

What you can do:

Spread the word. Help your people.[ad#Adsense-200by200sq]

Share

Africa has potential to solve own problems, Canadian Researchers say

Amy Husser, Postmedia News

A young girl receives a vaccine on November 23, 2009 in Monrovia, Liberia in a file photo. Photograph by: Glenna Gordon, AFP/Getty Images
A young girl receives a vaccine on November 23, 2009 in Monrovia, Liberia in a file photo. Photograph by: Glenna Gordon, AFP/Getty Images

In spite of a global perception as being “dependent, pestilence-ridden and suffering,” Africa has the ingenuity and conviction to solve its own health problems, Canadian researchers say in a sweeping new look at the continent.

A team of researchers conducted hundreds of interviews in nearly 100 locations across sub-Saharan Africa to offer a “unique microscope” on neglected health problems for Afica.

The “landmark collection” of papers — published Sunday in the U.K.-based BioMed Central — outlines 25 innovative health technologies they say deserve more attention.

The researchers paint Africa as a hub of innovation, being held back only by finances and cultural biases, resulting in a lack of access to global markets.

“The bottom line is there’s a lot more ideas and talent in Africa . . . than there are products on the market helping people improve their health,” says Peter Singer, director of the McLaughlin-Rotman Centre for Global Health, which conducted the research.

“In the long term, the sustainable solutions to Africa’s health problems rest with the home team.”

According to lead researcher Ken Simiyu, the 25 technologies are considered “stagnant” because they languish in African health institutes instead of being converted into a viable product or service for local markets.

Examples include a portable medical-waste incinerator created in Kenya that can cut down on byproducts produced during mass vaccinations in rural areas, or a Ghana-developed diagnostic test for schistosoma, a parasitic disease that affects as much as 50 per cent of the population in some areas of Africa.

And in Kenya, scientists have isolated human odours that effectively repel mosquitos; an adapted insecticide could cut down on malaria, which kills nearly one million people — mostly African children — annually.

“What is holding them back is they have not been able to get a commercial partner who can transform these chemical entities . . . into a product that is really deliverable to the market,” said Simiyu.

[ad#Adsense-200by200sq]

Share

Multi-National Corporations play it ‘dirty’ in Africa

Former US Vice President and CEO of Halliburton
Former US Vice President and CEO of Halliburton

Corruption is a worldwide problem. For convenience sake, it has been widely associated with developing countries  for the most part. It would be dishonest on my part to defend the developing world against charges of corruption. But the story is never complete when we only call the developing country like Ghana or Nigeria corrupt. That means we are only looking at one side of the coin.

Multi-national Corporations (MNCs) with roots in the developing world have a dominating role in propagating this disease in the developing world.

Last week, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) of Nigeria announced plans to charge Dick Cheney, former Vice President (VP) of the US, with corruption. Mr. Cheney acted as the CEO of Halliburton from 1995 to 2000. Documents coming to light reveal that during that time, the company participated in corrupt and fraudulent activities in Nigeria. One source states that about $180 million was used by Halliburton to bride its way to acquire lucrative natural gas contacts in Nigeria.
[ad#Adsense-200by90]
This is just one example of large companies who have the resources to hire experts who can cope with the bureaucratic hurdles normally characteristic of most African countries and obscure rules of play.

I’m very much aware of the situation in Ghana. Local entrepreneurs fight and give up in securing land and other licenses to start operating businesses while International Corporation can work around the system overnight and be in business the next morning. They have the means to “oil” the administrative machinery and speed up long drawn-out decision-making processes.

These corporations are not only infecting our system with the disease that we’ve been fighting for decades, in fact, some of them are directly or indirectly responsible for civil unrest and wars.

In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), it is estimated that nearly five million people have died in wars, the primary drive of which is the fulfillment of the Western economies and people’s unquenchable craving for high-quality jewels and precious minerals such as diamond. Where do the rebels get their arms from? They’re surely not locally made.

The educated elite in Africa benefit from this serfdom. This has become a war of attrition. The system of corruption propagated by MNCs in collaboration with African politicians has become a type of civil war in which the man or woman on the street cannot distinguish between a friend and a foe. They know that these corporations and their local leaders are making fortunes but they see none of the benefits in their everyday lives. Gold and diamonds from Ghana, diamond from the DRC, oil from Nigeria, cocoa from Ivory Coast and the list goes on,  but a tin of milk is a luxury to most families.

It is easy for richer countries to attribute African development problems to corruption by African leaders. That is just part of the story. The role multi-national Corporations  play should be addressed by their respective governments if these governments really care about Africa.  The Western media needs to do a better job covering their corporations doing business in Africa.

I trust that the Nigerian EFCC hold Halliburton according to the very letter of the laws of the land. I’ll also have my ears widely open with regard to what steps the US Department of State takes. If I find something that I think will  interest you, I’ll report it as usual. After all, that’s the very purpose this website was built to serve. Please check back

Share

Surviving as an International student: Friendship and Dating

This is Part 3 of our series ‘Surviving as an International Student’. Today, we cover Friendship and Dating. We hope that African students studying abroad and those contemplating doing so may find these materials useful

Your first weeks as an international student will be ones of adjustment and you may experience culture shock.

The people you pass may smile, say, “Hello, how are you?” and keep walking past you. People might not know where your country is located. What have you gotten yourself into?
You may have to weave yourself into the society as soon as you can in order to enjoy your life. You may encounter difficulties in several areas and the extent will depend on whether you’re single or married: In Part 3 of the series Surving as an International Student, we will discuss Friendship and Dating
Friendship: Most people you will come in contact with will be friendly, however international students often remark that while Westerners are “polite”, they can appear to be distant or cold. The best way to strike up a conversation is to talk about the weather since it is seen as an important aspect of the society. This probably sounds strange, but the longer you’re here, the more sense it will make.
Dating: Dating is developing a romantic relationship with someone. Dating is common among students; however, no one can force you to date or go out with him/her against your will. Also, going on a date does not mean consenting to have sex; it just means that you are interested in spending time with the person. Friendships between people of the opposite-sex are common and are not necessarily dating and it is important to respect this boundary where it exists. Rather than assume that you are in a relationship or that one has consented to an act, always ask questions for clarifications. Be also aware that NO means NO. If someone is not interested in having a sexual relationship with you, pursuing it could have serious legal consequences such as sexual harassment or assault charges.
Traditionally men have taken the initiative in asking women on dates, but this is changing as women are asserting their equal status in society. Common dating events include dinners, concerts, movies, and plays. If you want to know someone better, you might ask the person to join you for coffee or a lunch; such meetings can provide the beginning of an enduring friendship without the pressure of being a “date.” It used to be the practice that the one who invited a person on a date would pay for any expenses incurred (such as the dinner check or the ticket price). It is becoming more common for people on a date to “go Dutch,” which means that each person pays for his or her own expenses.
In some cultures, if a woman agrees to spend an evening with a man, it is assumed automatically that ‘it will happen’. In the West, making this assumption and following it up with some premature actions can bring your academic career to a miserable end. You may even have to do some time in jail.
As far as dating and romantic relationships are concerned, if in doubt, the first thing to do is to Ask, the second thing to do is to Ask, and the third again is just Ask.

Enjoy your studies

(These are materials extracted from several student bulletins and academic sources mixed with my personal thoughts. If you would like to continue to the series ‘Surviving as an International Student’, please email info@talkafrique.com)

Share

World is getting more corrupt; Check who made the cut

(Image credit mccoy.lib.siu.edu)

The world is considered a more corrupt place now than it was three years ago, a poll suggests.

Some 56% of people interviewed by Transparency International said their country had become more corrupt.

The organisation put Afghanistan, Nigeria, Iraq and India in the most corrupt category, followed by China, Russia and much of the Middle East.

Meanwhile, a BBC poll suggests that corruption is the world’s most talked about problem.

About one in five of those polled by the BBC said they had discussed issues relating to corruption with others in the last month, making it the most talked about concern ahead of climate change, poverty, unemployment and rising food and energy costs.

In the Transparency International survey, political parties were regarded as the most corrupt institutions, and 50% of people believed their government was ineffective at tackling the problem.

One in four of those polled said they had paid a bribe in the past year – the police being the most common recipient.

Some 29% of bribes went to the police, 20% to registry and permit officials, and 14% to members of the judiciary.

Political parties have long been regarded as the most corrupt institutions – they topped the list in Transparency’s 2004 barometer with 71%. In this year’s report, 80% regarded them as corrupt.

Religious bodies experienced a sharp rise in people regarding them as corrupt – 28% in 2004 increased to 53% by 2010.

People from Afghanistan, Nigeria, Iraq and India were among those who perceived the highest levels of corruption in their daily lives.

At least half of the people surveyed in those countries reported paying a bribe in the past year.

While people from Cambodia (84%) and Liberia (89%) were the most likely to have to pay a bribe, the Danish reported 0% bribery.

Robin Hodess, Transparency’s policy and research director, expressed particular concern at the figures on bribery.

“Unfortunately people’s experience with bribery most often involves the police, and this is really worrying,” she said.

“It’s a figure that’s grown in the past few years. It’s nearly doubled, in fact, since 2006. Nearly one in three people who had contact with the police around the world had to pay a bribe.”

By region, people in sub-Saharan Africa were the most likely to have paid a bribe (56%).

Bribe taking was least common in EU countries and North America (both 5%) – although these were the two regions seeing the biggest increase in concern about corruption.

Analysts blame this rising concern on the global financial crisis for undermining people’s faith in government, banks and economic institutions.

The lobby group interviewed 90,000 people in 86 countries to compile its corruption barometer.

Poverty

The opinion poll commissioned by the BBC sampled 13,000 people in 26 nations.

One question asked people to rate which issues they saw as most serious.
Corruption was ranked as the second most important topic behind poverty.

Respondents in Brazil, Egypt, Colombia, the Philippines and Kenya were especially likely to view corruption as a very serious issue.

In Europe, Italians were the most concerned about bribe taking.

Publication of the BBC poll coincides with anti-corruption day held by the United Nations.

Why pay a bribe?
  • In sub-Saharan Africa, 67%of bribes were to avoid trouble with the authorities
  • In the Arab world and Latin America most bribes were paid to speed things up
  • In Asia-Pacific, 35% of people bribed to get a service they were entitled to
  • In North America and the EU, most bribe payers say they could not remember why they had paid

Source: Global Corruption Barometer 2010

Percentage of responders who paid bribe last year

(Replotted. Data from Transparency International Global Corruption Barometer)

Share