The 2012 Elections: The Juju-Marabou Games Gegin

Commentary/Ghana/Africa

It doesn’t matter if Ghana’s 2012 general elections is a year away; campaigning of some sorts is underway. Democracy-crazy, everyday appears to be campaigning day. The mass media is charged. Character, development issues, policies and programmes jumble easily with foul language and the irrational juju-marabou spiritual predictions. The past veers into the present and the present into the past.

While the unfolding political drama can be entertaining, it is sometimes awkward. The ruling National Democratic Congress (NDC) touts its incumbent President John Atta Mills as honest, and accuses the main opposition National Patriotic Party (NPP) presidential candidate Nana Akufo Addo as once dabbling in marijuana. The NPP sells Nana Akufo Addo as having big development ideas, and charges Atta Mills as visionless.

Despite the universality of all this, it is the peculiar Ghanaian/African cultural sensibilities that disturb the infant democratic process: the appropriation of traditional spiritualists into the democratic politics that is expected to generate development thoughts.

A non-Ghanaian may find it weird to read headlines like “MOCTAR BAMBA: NANA ADDO’S ADVISOR ON JUJU AFFAIRS …Yes, I consult spiritualists in Mali, Nigeria and Benin” or “A Kumasi-based Spiritualist Predicts Atta Mills Will Win the 2012 Elections.” “Sheikh Mallam Musah had prophesized that the current leader of the opposition NPP Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo Addo has not been spiritually chosen to lead this nation after the 2012 elections … According to the renowned spiritualist the NPP will again suffer a painful defeat from the hands of the ruling National Democratic Congress (NDC) come 2012 because the flag bearer is not spiritually ordained to rule the country,” the Accra-based The Al-Hajj newspaper reported.

As expected, the NPP responded, pandering for metaphysical attention. Its national organizer, Moctar Bamba, repudiated Sheik Mallam Musa’s prophesy. Moctar said he has been undertaking “spiritual consultations on behalf of Nana Akufo Addo which shows that Nana Akufo- Addo will win 2012 elections.” The spiritual consultations, Moctar disclosed to shocked Ghanaians, took him to some West African states such as Nigeria, Mali and Benin.

The leaks may seem like some sort of spiritual playact to score political mileage in a vastly superstitious society but some members of the political parties do consult and spend large amount of money on traditional spiritualists and prophets to determine whether they will win elections or not. And where appropriate, elaborate spiritual rituals are undertaken to turn predicted lose into win.

Whether false or not, both the NDC and the NPP are deliberately tapping into the mind-set of gullible Ghanaians, who are stuck with the spiritualists, and, like their politicians, find it difficult to extricate themselves from such absurd believes. The political spiritual battle between the NDC and the NPP is seen in the spiritual imageries that have quietly been projected by the Atta Mills presidency over the past three years. The effects are dramatic and intoxicating. The NPP occasionally counter it but the game rolls on, fast heating up as the 2012 general elections approach.

Dominic Nitiwul, the NPP Member of Parliament for Bimbilla, created a row recently when he alleged that “President John Evans Atta Mills was helped spiritually to win the presidency by a “magic ring” he wore during the 2008 elections.” Since becoming President, Atta Mills’ obsession with spiritualists is an open secret. Despite Dominic Nitiwul, with MBA and LLM degrees, expected to be exceptionally rational in dealing with juju-marabou spiritual issues, plays-on, pandering to the irrational juju-marabou spiritual sports. The popular Nigerian spiritualist, Temitope Balogun (TB) Joshua, founder of the Lagos, Nigeria-based The Synagogue, Church of All Nations, plays the spiritual game well with President Atta Mills.

Like Sheikh Mallam Musah, TB Joshua is alleged to have prophesized that candidate Atta Mills would be President of Ghana during the 2008 presidential election. Superstitiously, candidate Atta Mills visited TB Joshua before the 2008 presidential elections in Lagos. Like Grigori Rasputin, the Russian mystic who had immense influence on the Russian Emperor Nicholas 11, TB Joshua is said to have powerful control over Atta Mills, helping him participate in the political spiritual sports.

The NPP, bent on wrestling power from Atta Mills and his NDC, isn’t joking. In Moctar Bamba, the NPP is playing the political spiritual games with the NDC. Such excessive concentrations on the spiritual games have made scientific opinion polls less listened to. Few scientific opinion polls are independent; most are conducted by the political parties. Like the spiritual predictions, each poll appears coloured by where the polling organization is coming from. Each political party disagrees with any poll that doesn’t favour their forecasts.

The juju-marabou spiritual games undeservedly dominate the democratic space. Hardcore development issues, policies, programmes and intellectual discourse are supposed to dictate the democratic process and push the excessive irrational juju-marabou spiritual debates out of the democratic practices. The democratic process appears impotent in the face of the juju-marabou mediums, who still direct the politics of ideas, thus undermining wobbly development issues.

As an African development watcher, the preposterous Ghanaian political spiritual bickering, short of higher debates on development from the political class for Ghana’s progress, leaves me concerned.

Abuse of Painkillers is Epidemic in the United States, Government Reports

Abuse of prescription painkiller have reached “epidemic” levels in the US, a government report says.

Overdoses of pain relievers cause more deaths than heroin and cocaine combined, the report has found.

It says sales and prescriptions of the drugs rose sharply in recent years and this was linked to the rise in overdoses.

Narcotic painkillers are prescribed to relieve chronic pain but the drugs can be “highly addictive”, the report says.

The report, published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), said fatalities caused by narcotic pain relievers have more than tripled in the last 10 years – equivalent to 40 deaths a day.

Last year, a national survey on drug use and health showed that one in 20 Americans over the age of 12 said they had used painkillers for non-medical reasons.

Named as the fastest growing drug problem facing the US, narcotic painkillers are increasingly used recreationally – for the high they cause.

Surging sales

“Almost 5,500 people start to misuse prescription painkillers every day,” said Pamela Hyde, administrator for the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, a federal body.

Sales of the drugs to pharmacies and health care facilities have surged more than 300% since 1999, according to figures from the Drug Enforcement Administration.

But prescriptions of the drug have risen sharply too.

The report says enough medicine was prescribed last year to keep every American adult medicated for one month.

Florida was found to have the highest rate of sales of narcotic painkillers per person, almost three times the rate in Illinois, which had the lowest rate.

Officials believe state health policies can help reverse the trend.

The report recommends tracking prescriptions more carefully and cracking down on “pill mills” (clinics that prescribe drugs inappropriately) and “doctor shopping” (when patients collect prescriptions from several doctors).

“This highlights the importance of states getting policies right on preventing drug abuse,” CDC Thomas Frieden told the Associated Press news agency.

In 2008, almost 15,000 deaths were caused by prescription painkillers, including the death of actor Heath Ledger.

Why are South Africa’s Women Only Just Getting the Attention They Deserve?

Jaymi McCann

Following this week’s coverage of corrective rape in South Africa, I can’t help but ask why it has taken the world’s media so long to catch on?

South Africa features some of the highest numbers of rape in the world and a survey over 2 years ago showed that one in four men freely admit raping at least one woman.

It is also true that the cautionary rule that requires judges to ere on the side of caution when trying a rapist was only abolished in 2007, while the distribution of HIV treatment is still conditional on the victim reporting her attack.

So I ask again. Why has it taken so long for the world’s media to pick up on this?

The progress that this country has achieved in a short time is clearly commendable. They managed a smooth transition from apartheid to democracy with a relative lack of violence. They established a rule of law, democratic elections, a bill of rights, and signed an unprecedented 70 international treaties and agreements in just six years.

From a western perspective South Africa is a shining example of what a successful democracy can look like in a continent fraught with poverty and corruption.

But, it takes more than a lick of paint to cover what are deeply embedded cultural attitudes towards women.

Rape in many areas of society is not treated with the gravitas it deserves. It is considered a normal thing, the result of the natural balance of power between men and women. But by associating rape with an everyday occurrence, the stigma of violence is taken away from it.

Excuses such as ‘she was dressed like a slut’, or ‘she was asking for it’ are all too common. Never mind the mind-boggling idea that rape will turn a lesbian straight, or show her what she is missing.

Technically, rape and sexual assault are outlawed by law. Women’s rights are enshrined in the constitution but evidence shows that enforcement and the implementation of these rights on the ground is shoddy at best.

A 2010 inspection of 430 police stations across the country showed that many were failing to reach fulfil their legal obligations towards women with regard to domestic violence, and a worrying number of police were accused to ignoring, and turning complainants away.

To some, women’s issues are not political. They are seen as private issues, to be dealt with at home. This reduces their importance, reduces the impact that rape can have on a woman. It ignores the fact that rape is not about sex, it is about power and the complete elimination of a human’s right to possess her own sexuality.

Power is the key to reform, both in society and institutionally. Female South African politician Frene Ginwala said, “Politics is about power and women’s liberation is about power. Until we empower women organisationally, we cannot empower ourselves.”

This is what women in South Africa are starting to do. Following the rape of several young girls in Johannesburg due to their ‘disrespectful clothing’ a few years ago, local charities encouraged women to protest. Hoards took to the streets, with placards declaring female independence and in doing so they highlighted the lack of action from the local government and police. The protest forced the government to condemn the action effectively transforming the issue into a political one in the eyes of the public.

Another example is Luleke Sizwe, an organisation fighting against corrective rape, who started an online petition for a change in policy towards the issue. They gained 170,000 signatures in just four months, and are now in discussions with the Justice minister to have law changed so that corrective rape is treated as a hate crime, and therefore punishable by the harshest sentences. They worked with a few volunteers and little media coverage. Without the internet, their cause would have been ignored. These causes are clearly under-reported.

South Africa is a country in progress. Rather than only covering these issues when an alarming survey is published or a foreign national is involved, I would rather that its inspiring people received the publicity they deserve and so desperately need.

Jaymi McCann

laswegian freelance journalist living in London studying the MA in Newspaper Journalism

Follow Jaymi McCann on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Jaymi_McCann

Unites States Troops Playing a Growing Role in Africa’s Military Battles

NAIROBI, Kenya — While putting few U.S. troops at risk, the United States is playing a growing role in Africa’s military battles, using special forces advisers, drones and tens of millions of dollars in military aid to combat a growing and multifaceted security threat.

Once again, the focus is Somalia, the lawless nation that was the site of America’s last large-scale military intervention in Africa in the early 1990s. By the time U.S. forces departed, 44 Army soldiers, Marines and airmen had been killed and dozens more wounded.

This time the United States is playing a less visible role, providing intelligence and training to fight militants across the continent, from Mauritania in the west along the Atlantic coast, to Somalia in the east along the Indian Ocean.

The renewed focus on Africa follows a series of recent and dramatic attacks.

In August, a hard-line Islamist group in Nigeria known as Boko Haram bombed the U.N. headquarters in the capital, Abuja, killing 24 people. A year earlier, militants from the Somali group al-Shabab unleashed twin bombings in Kampala, Uganda, that killed 76. And a Nigerian man tried to blow up an airliner over Detroit on Christmas Day 2009 during a flight that originated from Lagos, Nigeria.

Most worrisome to the United States is al-Shabab, an al-Qaida-linked group in Somalia that has recruited dozens of Americans, most of Somali descent.

“If you ask me what keeps me awake at night, it is the thought of an American passport-holding person who transits through a training camp in Somalia and gets some skill and then finds their way back into the United States to attack Americans,” Gen. Carter Ham, the commander of the U.S. Africa Command, said in Washington this month. “That’s mission failure for us.”

U.S. and European officials also worry that AQIM – an al-Qaida group that operates in the west and north of Africa – is working to establish links with Boko Haram and al-Shabab, the Somali insurgent group.

“I think the security threats emanating from Africa are being taken more seriously than they have been before, and they’re more real,” said Jennifer Cooke, the director of the Africa program at the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies.

The U.S. is conducting counterterrorism training and equipping militaries in countries including Algeria, Burkina Faso, Chad, Mali, Mauritania, Morocco, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal and Tunisia to “preclude terrorists from establishing sanctuaries,” according to the U.S. Africa Command.

In Somalia, the U.S. helps support 9,000 troops from Uganda and Burundi to fight militants in Mogadishu, the Somali capital. In June, the Pentagon moved to send nearly $45 million in military equipment, including four drones, body armor and night-vision and communications gear, for use in the fight against al-Shabab.

The U.S. also announced this month it is sending 100 advisers, most of them special forces, to help direct the fight against the rebel Lord’s Resistance Army in Central Africa and efforts to kill or capture its leader, Joseph Kony, who is wanted by the International Criminal Court. In Libya, U.S. fighter planes helped rebels defeat former dictator Moammar Gadhafi.

In the latest attack against Africa’s militants, Kenya deployed troops this month into southern Somalia to fight al-Shabab insurgents. The U.S. says it is not aiding Kenya’s incursion, but America has given Kenya $24 million in aid this year “to counter terrorists and participate in peacekeeping operations,” the U.S. Embassy said.

The U.S. government “has had a burr under its saddle about Somalia” for years, dating to the 1993 downing of two U.S. helicopters over Mogadishu in a battle that became known as Black Hawk Down, said John Pike of the Globalsecurity.org think tank near Washington. Eighteen U.S. troops were killed.

At that time, Washington had deployed thousands of troops to combat a famine, but the mission escalated into a hunt for warlords.

These days, only a handful of U.S. troops are involved directly in Somalia – special forces troops who enter on kill missions. In 2009, Navy SEALs targeted and killed al-Qaida operative Saleh Ali Saleh Nabhan in a helicopter raid. The Americans jumped out of the helicopters, grabbed Nabhan’s body from his bullet-riddled convoy and flew off. The corpse – like Osama bin Laden’s two years later – was buried at sea.

Pike, who monitors defense issues, said the Pentagon has ramped up operations in Africa tremendously since the time of former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, who didn’t see Africa as being in America’s strategic interest.

“The U.S. has really developed an interest in Africa that we just have never seen before,” Pike said.

“Between all the goings and comings in the Horn of Africa and all this snake-eater (special forces) Sahara stuff … it’s all over the place,” Pike said. “Since I think an awful lot of it is being run out of Special Operations Command and out of (the CIA), I think it probably far larger than anyone imagines.”

U.S. drones launched from the Seychelles islands in the Indian Ocean also provide intelligence, and the pilotless planes are capable of being armed.

Al-Shabab counts 31 American citizens among its ranks, a U.S. official in Washington told The Associated Press. They’re mostly American-Somalis who left the U.S. to join the group. The U.S. official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive intelligence matters, said foreign fighters among al-Shabab’s ranks want to attack Western targets.

Intelligence has revealed sophisticated plans by al-Shabab to attack targets in Europe, the official said, but the operations have been disrupted by the recent stepped-up fighting in Somalia.

Ugandan and Burundian troops fighting al-Shabab militants in Mogadishu as part of an African Union force have pushed back the insurgents in recent months and now control most of the capital. The Kenyan incursion has forced al-Shabab to fight on its southern flank as well.

Though the Kenyan invasion appears to further the U.S. goal of pressuring al-Shabab, U.S. officials say the American military is not providing assistance.

“The United States has supported Kenyan efforts to improve its ability to monitor and control often porous land and maritime borders and territory exploited by terrorists and illicit traffickers, particularly along its border with Somalia,” said Katya Thomas, a spokeswoman at the U.S. Embassy in Nairobi.

But, she added: “The United States did not encourage the Kenyan government to act, nor did Kenya seek our views. We note that Kenya has a right to defend itself against threats to its security and its citizens.”

Some aspects of Kenya’s military adventure appear poorly thought out. Troops moved in just as seasonal rains began and are now bogged down in the mud – a literal reminder of the potential quagmire for countries that intervene in Somalia, whose last nationwide leader was overthrown in 1991.

A paper published by the U.S. Army examining the ill-fated U.S. mission in Somalia in the 1990s concluded that “the chaotic political situation of that unhappy land bogged down U.S. and allied forces in what became, in effect, a poorly organized United Nations nation-building operation.”

It was a 2006 invasion of Somalia by Ethiopia that gave rise to the militants now known as al-Shabab.

“That’s the problem with Somalia, there is just no easy answer,” said Cooke, the analyst. “The problem is so huge and multi-faceted that tackling one aspect of it, i.e., beating back al-Shabab, just can’t fix it. Part of the problem is that the government we have invested in as our key partner in Somalia is a fiction of a government, and so Kenya can try to create some space, but there is nothing to fill that.”

The chairman of the Pentagon’s Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, told the House Armed Services Committee this month that the U.S. must remain active in Africa because terrorists are networked globally.

“One of the places they sit is Pakistan. One of the places they sit is Afghanistan. One of the places they sit is the African continent,” Dempsey said.

________________________________________________________________________

Associated Press reporter Lolita Baldor in Washington contributed to this report.

Daily Aspirin Blocks Bowel Cancer

By James Gallagher Health reporter, BBC News

A daily dose of aspirin should be given to people at high risk of bowel cancer, say scientists.

Two pills a day for two years reduced the incidence of bowel cancer by 63% in a group of 861 at-risk patients, a study reported in The Lancet said.

Newcastle University’s Prof Sir John Burn, who led the study, said the evidence “seems overwhelmingly strong”.

Other experts said the findings added to a growing body of proof that aspirin could be used in the fight on cancer.

The study was conducted on 861 patients with Lynch syndrome, which affects one in every 1,000 people.

They struggle to detect and repair damaged DNA which means they are more likely to develop a range of cancers including those of the bowel, womb and stomach.

‘Good deal’

When looking at all patients in the trial, those in the group given 600 milligrams of aspirin every day developed 19 tumours compared to 34 tumours in the other “control” group, a reduction of 44%.

When the researchers looked at just those patients who took the medication for at least two years the reduction was 63%.

There was also an effect on other cancers linked to Lynch syndrome, which fell by half in the treatment group.

Prof Sir John Burn, from Newcastle University, said there were 30,000 adults in the UK with Lynch syndrome.

If all were given the treatment he said it would prevent 10,000 cancers over 30 years and he speculated that this could possibly prevent 1,000 deaths from the disease.

However, there would also be side effects.

“If we can prevent 10,000 cancers in return for 1,000 ulcers and 100 strokes, in most people’s minds that’s a good deal,” he said.

“People who’ve got a clear family history of, particularly, bowel cancer should seriously consider adding low dose aspirin to their routine and particularly those people who’ve got a genetic predisposition.”

Aspirin is already well known to reduce the risk of heart attack and stroke in high risk patients.

Other studies over the past two decades have suggested the pain killer reduced cancer risk, but this was the first randomised control trial, specifically for aspirin in cancer, to prove it.

In 2010, a study suggested patients given aspirin had a 25% lower risk of death during that trial.

Prof Peter Rothwell, from Oxford University, who conducted that study said the latest research “certainly helps to build a consistent picture, all pointing in the same direction that there is a link with cancer”.

Cancer Research UK’s Prof Chris Paraskeva said: “This adds to the growing body of evidence showing the importance of aspirin, and aspirin-like drugs, in the fight against cancer.”

‘Balanced argument’

One of the questions asked by the research into aspirin was whether healthy people with no family risks should take the drug.

The lower the risk of heart attack or cancer, the lower the benefit of taking aspirin, yet there are still potentially deadly side effects.

Sir John said that it was a “finely balanced argument” and that he decided the risks were worth it for him.

“I think where we’re headed for is people that are in their 50s and 60s would look very seriously at adding a low dose aspirin to their daily routine because it’s giving protection against cancer, heart attack and stroke.

“But if they do that they’ve got to have their eyes wide open. They will increase their risk of ulcers and gastrointestinal bleeds and very rarely they will have a stroke caused by the aspirin.”

In Ghana, Stigma Stymies Breast Cancer Prevention

Inter Press Service (IPS), by Paul Carlucci and Henrietta Abayie

(Ghana) — Mary Mingle thought she had a boil on her breast, so she bought some medication and tried to treat it at home. Two months later, bothered by persistent pain, she went to the doctor. There were eleven lumps in her breasts. She had first stage cancer, and her breasts, along with her uterus, would have to be removed.

“The doctor encouraged me,” she says. “The earlier I got them removed, the better. Otherwise, I would lose my life.”

Now, years after her surgery, only five people in her personal life know about her double mastectomy: her three children, her sister, and her husband. She’s been carrying her secret for about 20 years, hiding it from her extended family with a padded bra because she is afraid she will be stigmatised. She also hides it from her church, for the same reason.

“I don’t want them to be aware,” she says, her voice a tiny whisper.

Health officials in Ghana say breast cancer is a growing problem compounded by untrained medical practitioners, a lack of equipment, and unhealthy, sometimes fatal, cultural beliefs.

Historically, breast cancer has received scant attention in this West African country. International donors and institutions have been focused on communicable diseases like malaria and HIV/AIDS. Despite the fact that, according to Ghana Health Services (GHS), non-communicable diseases are the leading causes of death.

“It’s only now that attention is being drawn to it,” says Dr. Kofi Nyarko, head of the GHS cancer control programme.

There aren’t any solid statistics yet. In the capital of Accra, the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, one of two full service cancer facilities in the country, is building an in-hospital registry of cases. In Kumasi, the country’s second biggest city in Ashanti Region, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital is also working on a database.

According to Dr. Verne Vanderpuye, a clinical oncologist at Korle Bu, the hospital gets about 3,000 breast cancer referrals a year.

“The main problem is that people don’t come early,” she says. “In an untreated case, when it’s moved beyond the breast, the average lifespan is one-and-a-half to two years. It will move from the breast, to the lymphs, to the lungs, to the liver, to the bones, and to the brain.”

Nyarko says the hospitals have gathered enough information for officials to know that breast cancer is becoming more prevalent, and its victims are younger and younger.

“It’s no longer a disease for the old,” he adds.

About three years ago, a focus on non-communicable disease began to take shape. In 2008, in collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO), the Ministry of Health set up a national Cancer Steering Committee. The following year, Nyarko became the government’s cancer chief.

Working with WHO, GHS has identified cost effective treatment and detection strategies. Radiology equipment is scarce in Ghana – there are 10 mammogram machines in the whole country, six of which are in private institutions – so there will be a focus on clinical examinations, with mammograms for follow ups. It is a strategy that will require training.

“You need human resources,” Nyarko says. “You need infrastructure. You need certain equipment in place. You need all these things and money for training. The fact that you are a doctor or you are a nurse does not mean you can examine someone and say, ‘You are free (of cancer).’ You need to be trained.”

Nyarko expects a comprehensive national strategy will be launched by the end of the year. In addition to increased clinical examinations, the government would also like to build a full service hospital in Tamale, the biggest city in Ghana’s relatively undeveloped Northern Region.

There is also a big emphasis on prevention and awareness, with a series of posters and leaflets produced in partnership with the Geneva-based Union for International Cancer Control. Aside from promoting exercise and fresh food diets, the campaign is also meant to chip away at Ghana’s cultural oppression of breast cancer victims.

“People think that cancer is a call to death, but we are telling them that cancer can be cured,” Nyarko says. “We are aware that awareness is very low, even amongst the social elite. So we are working on that.”

It is not uncommon for victims to be shunned by their husbands or families. And in a country where women do a good deal of work, both around the house and in markets, husbands are reluctant to lose their wives to months of treatment.

Furthermore, chemotherapy is not covered by health insurance and can cost almost 2,000 dollars in just two weeks.

According to the World Bank, Ghana’s 24 million people live on an average of 1,283 dollars a year. The Jubilee oil find in the country’s Western Region is expected to help push GDP growth to 13.4 per cent in 2011, but there is no guarantee that will influence the average annual income.

“There’s also the fact that you could lose your breast,” says Vanderpuye. “We have a polygamous society, whether we like it or not. They might say you are not a whole woman.”

Like many African countries, Ghana is hugely religious. Many pastors tell their flocks that cancer is a spiritual illness, and that the answer is prayer, not surgery. As a result, some women do not go to the hospital until the tumours have spread. And then they die.

“They say the surgery kills, but they wait so long that the cancer spreads, so it appears surgery kills,” says Gladys Boateng, a breast cancer survivor and the founder of Reach for Recovery.

Civil society groups like Reach for Recovery also play a role in spreading awareness. Formed after Boateng survived her own bout with breast cancer, the group has reached 3,000 sufferers in the past eight years. Survivors give back to the group, visiting women in hospitals and helping with screening missions in remote or rural areas.

But even advocates keep secrets. Boateng will not discuss her husband’s reaction to her ordeal. She just offers a tight smile and declines comment. Nyarko, who has been watching international dollars lean heavily toward infectious diseases, is predicting a continued sea change in donor awareness. He is ready – all he needs are resources.

“It’s just now that there’s an emphasis on non-communicable diseases,” he stresses. “You know the right thing to do. You know the right thing to say. But you do not have the resources.”

Africa’s Most Powerful Woman- Ellen

Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, President of Liberia and Nobel Prize Winner

Monrovia (Liberia) – In about two weeks after she won the prestigious Nobel Peace Prize, Forbes Magazine, one of the most influential business publications in the United States, named President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf of Liberia as the most “powerful woman on the African continent.” The Magazine, in its maiden Africa issue, lists the Liberian leader among 20 women influential women in the continent.

According to the first issue of Forbes Africa Magazine, which went on sale October 1, President Sirleaf tops the list of most powerful African women, with Nigeria’s Finance Minister Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala and Malawi’s Vice President Joyce Banda in second and third place, respectively.

The list includes 11 women from South Africa alone.

The magazine says about its No. 1 pick: “Ellen Johnson Sirleaf was elected in 2005 Liberia’s 24th president and Africa’s first woman president. Prior to her election, she worked for the World Bank and Citibank. She is a member of the prestigious Council of Women Leaders. In October 2010, she signed into law a Freedom of Information bill.”

The parent Forbes Magazine is famous worldwide for its lists, which make headlines, spring surprises and provoke debates. Its Africa edition promises to maintain this rich tradition by researching and creating its own lists.

According to Forbes Africa, its methodology for selecting its Top 20 list involved weighing up the size of the economy, market capitalization of companies or the personal wealth of the candidates, as well as researching Google hits, YouTube appearances, plus Facebook and Twitter followers.

It weighted the findings and ranked the tally to come up with the order of the list.

President Johnson Sirleaf is followed, on the Forbes Africa list by: Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, Minister of Finance of Nigeria; Joyce Banda, Vice President of Malawi; Gill Marcus, Governor, Reserve Bank of South Africa; Joice Mujuru, Vice President of Zimbabwe; Diezani Allison-Madueke, Nigeria’s Minister of Petroleum Resources; Isabel Dos Santos, Angolan Businesswoman; Maria Ramos, CEO of ABSA, a South African subsidiary of British Barclays Bank; Mamphela Ramphele, CEO, Circle Capital Partners, South Africa, and former Director of the World Bank; Linah Mohohlo, Governor, Bank of Botswana; and Nicky-Newton King, Future CEO, Johannesburg Stock Exchange, South Africa.

Also on the Top 20 list are: Wangari Maathai, Nobel Prize Laureate and Founder of the Greenbelt Movement of Kenya, who passed away in September; Siza Mzimela, CEO of South African Airways; Nonkululeko Nyembezi Heita, CEO of ArcelorMittal South Africa; Graça Machel, Chancellor of the University of Cape Town and UNICEF Goodwill Ambassador, South Africa; Pinky Moholi, CEO, Telkom, South Africa; Hynd Bouhia, former Director General, Casablanca Stock Exchange, Morocco; Bridgette Radebe, Chairman, Mmakau Mining, South Africa; Irene Charnley, Non-Executive Director, MTN Group & CEO Smile Telecommunications, South Africa; and Monlha Hlahla, CEO of Airports Company South Africa (ACSA).

The Informer (Liberia)

Africa’s Industrialization Through Green Economic Growth

The green economy may be in the way of Africa’s industrialization even if some of the continent’s industries are still grappling with efficient use of energy issues related to climate change.

These were the conclusions of some of the papers on Structural Transformation and Industrial Policies presented at the African Economic Conference, which went into its second day in Addis Ababa.

Salifou Issoufou and Nama Ouattara, from Universite Paris 11, France, in their paper entitled “Does Green Investment Raise Productivity?” indicated that there were three motivating factors for the green economy on the economic, environmental dimensions. These include an estimated U.S.$50-170 billion per year adaptation cost by the year 2030, the contribution of green investment to reduce carbon emissions, and the ability to address famine and poverty by applying green agricultural methods.

The researchers said that they presented new cross-country evidence on the macroeconomic impacts of green investment. In the study they conducted using various data from 1987-2007 from 46 African countries, they arrived at the conclusion that green investment was detrimental to productivity growth.

“Given the negative impacts of green investment, African countries may have to forgo climate change issues in their quest for industrialization,” the study said. “Overall, African countries should be cautious in their eagerness to adopt green technologies.”

In the paper, which they hoped would further the intellectual and policy discourse about the costs and benefits of the green economy for African countries, that countries may need to address, or continue to address the issues of absorptive capacity, efficiency of investment, structural and cultural gridlocks in order to fully reap the benefits of green investment.

“Energy Use and Sustainable Development: Evidence from the Industrial Sector in Nigeria”, a paper by Fidelis O.Ogwumike and Omo Aregbeyen, from the University of Ibadan, highlighted the case of Nigeria, where they criticized low-level awareness of energy efficiency issues among major Nigerian companies.

Finance for investment in energy efficiency is also not readily available either from retained earnings or bank loans due mainly to the financial crisis, according to the paper.

The presenters made their cases for the adoption of industrial energy efficient technologies and practices in developing countries as well as the introduction of incentives for energy efficiency practices.

African Development Bank