Asamoah Gyan Can Handle Sunderland Goal Burden

Sunderland striker Asamoah Gyan is confident he can handle the expectation of being the first-choice striker at the Stadium of Light.

The 25-year-old is currently the club’s only fit forward following Darren Bent’s move to Aston Villa, and injury to Danny Welbeck and Fraizer Campbell.

“I don’t doubt my quality, whether I am playing with two strikers or just one,” Gyan told BBC Newcastle.

“I think my game is impressive so far, and it’s a good thing for the team.”

The Ghana international has responded well thus far, taking his goal tally for the season to 10 in 28 appearances with the opener in Saturday’s 2-1 home defeat by Tottenham Hotspur, before Michael Dawson and Niko Kranjcar secured all three points for the visitors.

However, defeat means the Wearsiders have now lost three straight games.

“It’s sad that we have lost three games in a row, but the whole team is playing well,” Gyan added.

“Unfortunately we concede silly goals, but if we keep on concentrating on the game then we can do much better because we are playing good football.”

Sunderland signed Gyan from French Ligue 1 club Rennes in August 2010 for a club record fee of £13m.

(BBC Sports, Africa)

Why Are Democracies Contagious?

‘……man is created free but everywhere he goes he lives in chains….’ Rousseau’s remark about the pitfalls of modernization also serves as an adequate basis for extolling democracy as the best system of governance known to man. The inexorable spread of democratic practice can be attributed to many things such as the economic dominance of democratic states around the world. After all the US and its political allies in Europe, Asia, Latin America and even Africa have managed to take up the reins of economic power on the planet.

Every continent is economically dominated by democracies. Western European states such as Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Italy, Spain and many more are relatively better off than their eastern counterparts who are still recovering from the doldrums of communist rule and domination. The Bulgarias, Latvias, Moldovas are struggling to catch up and lest we forget only really started prospering after incorporating democratic practice into the political fabric of their changing societies.

Africa may be known for hardship and general social unrest but the emergence of democracies on the continent has proven to be a continental sedative. Nations such as Ghana, Cape Verde, Mali, Botswana, Namibia, South Africa, and the Mauritius who are beneficiaries of democratic political practice are economically better off than the non-democratic ones who continue to struggle with hybrid political systems that are mostly defined by political autocracy and military dictatorships. These methods of governance carry in their wake a massive abuse of human rights resulting in general economic despair and massive social unrest.

Everywhere in the world democracies generally flourish but does it explain the mass appeal of democratic governance around the globe? It could be argued that, China the world’s second largest economy is also not a democracy so surely alternative systems of governance can bring about national prosperity. The paroxysmal rise of democracies around the world however cannot be overlooked especially with recent events in North Africa. All across the Arab world monarchs and political leaders are beginning to worry as they marvel at extraordinary events in sister countries such as Tunisia where the erstwhile political autocrat Zine El Abidine Ben Ali was successfully overthrown by popular uprising.

The on-going effort by the people of Egypt to forcefully remove Hosni Mubarak is a continuation of what happened in Tunisia and the ripples may go even further in the Arab world. Former US President George W. Bush’s prediction that democratic forces will sweep across the Arab world with the right push is finally coming to fruition. Some have attributed this new political osmosis across the Arab world to the internet and online innovations such as twitter and facebook but the cause may go a lot further than that.

The call for political reform in Tunisia and now Egypt merely illustrates the philosophical adage that preceded this article. The intrinsic human will to be free is now being overtly expressed in nations that were hitherto immune to the spread of democratic governance. Democratic appeal lies not in its ability to generate income to its practitioners but rather in its ability to tap into the fundamental nature of man. The human desire to be free as expressed by Rousseau is instinctive so any political practice that fails to take this into consideration is bound to fail. The recent occurrences in the Northern part of Africa are a testament to this belief.

The Jasmine Revolution which started in Tunisia is expected or may inspire similar revolutions in Algeria, Libya, Morocco, Yemen and even Saudi Arabia. The French writer Albert Camus in one of his philosophical undertakings attributed the metaphysical revolt against God to the intrinsic human desire for freedom. In ‘L’homme Revolté’ (The Rebel), the famed author identifies two types of Revolutions. The one orchestrated by man against his maker and the type organised to oust earthly rulers such as monarchs and political despots. Both the metaphysical and physical revolutions are in consonance with the human call for freedom.

It must however be noted that, the metaphysical revolt against God resulted in the physical overthrow of monarchs in Europe for instance because political rule as a divine right seized to make sense leading to the outbreak of revolutions in countries such as France where monarchs ruled as a divine right. Liberté, égalité, fraternité, these words must resonate in every political system around the world for they are part and parcel of the human character which is why the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights by the United Nations identified democratic governance as a fundamental human right. States which therefore fail to subscribe to the basic tenets of democratic political systems are bound to experience some form of social unrest.

The call for freedom may not be immediate in non-democratic states but it can foment with time and explode with younger generations who feel disconnected from tradition and societal norms. This is so simply because in order to govern the modern man the nature of the ancient man needs to be respected and so far democracies have proven to be the only system of governance that empowers the citizenry to have a say in how they are going to be governed restoring in the process the natural human longing for freedom.

The Kind OF Rebranding Africa Needs

The last decade witnessed the resurgence of the buzz-word ‘rebranding’ in major African nations. From South Africa to Malawi, from Kenya to Nigeria, the story was the same. We witnessed rebranding jingoes and colorful advertisements from country to country but after all these years, have these rebranding efforts achieved their intended missions?

Africa has come to be associated with the image of a helpless continent that needs salvation. A continent that must adopt a predetermined posture, a ‘wanna be like them’, of the so-called nations that are acclaimed to have possessed the most sought-after traits. However, the achievements of Africans in varied fields world-wide tell a different story. From science and technology, trade and banking, from academia to entertainment and sports, the catalogue of achievements are too numerous to have earned the continent and its people such a negative image. All we see are horrible footages and colorful-gloss pictures of hungry-stricken malnourished children, refugees receiving food items from international donor agencies, pockets of population nearing extinction due to the HIV/AIDS pandemic, over-crowded cities with dilapidated infrastructures begging for World Bank’s intervention, etc. Do you call this international media conspiracy? You may be right.

However, our problems remain our problems. The way we go about solving them relies on the pertinent questions we ask instead of playing the blame-game. It is time to stop attributing our under-development to Western conspiracy and colonization which always give us the soft-landing. A landing that have placed the continent on the wrong footing of corruption, poverty, hunger, civil wars, electoral fraud, over-ambitious leaders, etc. These conditions were the yardsticks on which the so-called international organizations and development partners came in to play the ‘Big Brother’ role. What we as African people need do is take a journey of soul-searching, speak the truth to our conscience and resolve firmly that we as followers and leaders are ready to flow with current dynamics of change. Someone has said that ‘all great empires ever built were readily built in the heart of men before they came to their physical form’. The kinds of images we conceive in the eyes of our mind become the reality with time.

.

The type of rebranding we need as Africans is the rebranding of the mind. We do not need spend billions that could be channeled responsibly to improve and save lives in expensive “Nation Rebranding” campaigns.

SELF PERPETRATION IN POWER BY AFRICAN LEADERS: LESSONS FROM EGYPT

By Abiodun Fatai

Why are African leaders fond of perpetrating themselves in power?  This has been the case with the late Mobutu Sese Seko in Zaire, Mohammad Gaddafi of Libya, Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe, Paul Biya of Cameroon, Kamuzu Banda of Malawi, former Ibrahim Babangida of Nigeria, Omar Bongo of Gabon and Laurent Gbagbo of Ivory Coast, among others. It is simplistic to answer that they are so endeared to the benefits of power and are always unwilling to vacate power when there is need for them to do so. African leaders have been in the habit of designing series of Maradonic and Machiavellian strategies for self perpetuation in power. Yet, it is true that they often forget that power is the only a matrix which has in itself potential for destruction. It is only in Africa that I have seen leaders dying in power or been disgraced from power, after they have refused to heed to simple voice of reason. They just love power. The experience in Europe and other developed societies really shown the willingness of leaders to vacate power when the ovation is loudest. Even at a slightest public disapproval, they show that power is not their personal property. This is not so in Africa; African leaders cherish power and see it as a private property.

The recent events and revolution in Egypt that eventually led to the forcing out of Hosni Mubarak, the Egyptian President, after turbulent 18 days agitation and protest shows the sheer desperation of African leaders to sit-tight in power without heeding to the voice their people. A similar revolt had earlier taken place in Tunisia where President Zine El Abidine Ben Alli was ousted from power. This sheer desperation is only shrouded in the barefaced arrogance and insensitivity which some African leaders have continued to display against their people. Mubarak’s insistence further make the country ungovernable for 18 days with economic, political and social institutions completely suspended. The simple truism is that the period of the protest has no doubt fostered untold hardship on the Egyptians, which they are not likely to regain in due course.

In a similar manner, the former dictators such as General Sani Abacha of Nigeria, Mohammed Ghaddafi of Libya, Late President Mobutu Sese Seko of Zaire, and Paul Biya of Cameroon, among others, showed lack of concern and desperation to continue to rule through autocratic disposition with little regard for thier people. The conviction and commitment of the Egyptians over the 18 days of protest depict their resolve to be free from autocratic rule and crass disregard for the plight of humanity. Professor Ben Nwabueze was more poignant when he claimed that “which is driven by the people and their faith in human freedoms? There is no universally prescribed method of revolution, but where the quality of human life is trampled upon and the people’s rights are routinely abused, the people as a collective have a duty to stand up and declaim: “Never again!”

The Egyptians resolve was therefore not unfounded because it was as the result of many years of suppression, brutality, and denial of right and alienation. In spite of what Dr Reuben Abati called the myth,  for example, that religion is a binding factor that makes the Middle Eastern population easier to control and dominate, Egyptians have defied this odd by choosing to fight for their freedom from the manacles and shackles of oppression. The aftermath of the revolution has dubbed it a historic change and has been welcomed from across the world. The EU, US, Germany and UK have all reacted positively  claiming the resolve of the Egyptians have been justified and that it is an historic change capable of catapulting the country  from authoritarian regime to civilian and democratic order.

What lessons are there to be learnt from the revolt in Egypt? What happened in Egypt is a clear lesson to the West, especially United States. It also sounds a clear but unequivocal warning to sit-tight African leaders that their days are numbered. As for the West, it is a lesson that they have to grind their teeth because the Egyptian revolution has caught them in the dilemma of their own logic. When you implicitly support autocratic government for the clear reason of protecting your interest at the behest of the people sovereign in their country, then what you gain is the Egyptian revolution. The west must urgently rethink and learn the lesson. As for the sit-tight African leaders, although it is not clear whether other Africans like the Egyptians have the orientation and the consciousness displayed by the Egyptians in the Egyptian revolution, the truth however is that it is unpredictable when a revolution would be ripe like this. Nevertheless, if the Northern African people most of whom have been dominated and controlled with religion can stage such protest to oust their President, then what happened in Egypt is capable of happening elsewhere. There is certainly a limit to how long the people can be oppressed. The scenario in Egypt and Tunisia therefore serves a serious warning for sit-tight leaders and perpetrators in power.

Abiodun Fatai is a Lecturer in Political Science at the Lagos State University, and a PhD Candidate at the University of Ibadan, Nigeria

Kenya University Rankings Drop as South Africa Colleges Shine

Kenyan universities have dropped in academic rankings compared to their peers in Africa and beyond, a new research shows.

The latest study by Spanish research firm Webometrics shows that Kenya’s top universities dropped several places in the January 2011 Africa rankings compared to similar ratings in
July last year.

University of Nairobi and Strathmore University dropped to position 27 and 38 in Africa from position 26 and 22 in July last year.

Moi University was placed at 90 having dropped from position 74, according to the rankings which are based on an online measure of visibility and generation of research.

On the global front, all Kenyan universities have slipped out of the top 3,000 category since January 2009 when Strathmore was ranked at 2,404 worldwide.

No Kenyan university made it in the top 1,000 list in a more comprehensive ranking by the Academic Ranking of World Universities released in August last year, reflecting the low standing of the country’s institutions.

Lower prestige

The drop in the rankings means that Kenyan universities are relatively slow at adapting modern teaching technologies, a move that threatens critical skill base of graduates needed for competitiveness in the local and global labour market.

The poor ranking also means a lower prestige for Kenyan universities on the international stage, slowing down scholarly partnerships and funding from the top league universities and donors.

Though the choice of a university in Kenya is largely affected by cost considerations, prospective local and international students from wealthy families have started paying attention
to the league tables.

“There is enormous attention given to every league table that is published as well as its quality ranking. And they are taken seriously by students, government and especially by the media,” said Ms Ellen Hazelkorn, the main author of a study by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development which studied the influence of university rankings.

Kenyan universities have in the past two years gone big on physical expansions, opening several constituent colleges without a commensurate spend on academic staffing and learning
resources such as libraries.

The universities are yet to offer local degrees on a pure online platform, citing high initial costs and a deep-seated culture of classroom teaching.

The latest Webometrics rankings, however, show improvements among upcoming Kenyan universities.

United States International University (USIU) and Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (JKUAT) burst into the top 100 Africa list for the first time, standing at 78 and 89 respectively.

Kenyatta University moved up 29 places to stand at 51.

South Africa houses the best universities in the continent, chalking up the top nine places in the Webometric rankings, with University of Cape Town emerging tops.

Egypt is another major player in tertiary education, accounting for 16 of the top 100 slots in the Africa rankings.

Globally, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) reclaimed its pole position from Harvard University

(BusinessDaily.com)

The Role of the AU in Science and Technology Development in Africa

Here, we discuss some of the tasks the African Union (AU) can pursue in the area of Science and Technology (S&T) to bring prosperity to the African continent. The AU was formed from the Organization of African Unity in 2002, with a new vision of “An integrated, prosperous and peaceful Africa, driven by its own citizens and representing a dynamic force in the global arena.” In other words, the current African Union (AU) has the mandate to facilitate the search for solutions to the existing and emerging problems of African countries so as to quicken the pace of development. But then, what is going to be the method for development? Is it going to be by orthodox economic methods or by innovation through science and technology?

Africa’s Science and Technology Consolidated Plan of Action makes it clear that, the African Union (AU) acknowledges Science and Technology (S&T) as prerequisites for the rapid transformation of African economies, and to a level that positively impacts the standards of living of the majority of Africans. However, despite the series of meetings, which have occurred over the years to generate ideas to use S&T for Africa’s development, little has been achieved in terms of the general improvement of the standards of living of the African people. That is to say, if the AU only makes recommendations for individual countries to carry them out without taking the responsibility of accomplishing some of the tasks itself, it may be difficult for Africa to meet the millennium development goals (MDGs). Here, I suggest that that the AU also assumes an active role of promoting or establishing Research and Development (R&D) in the area of Science and Technology (S&T). In the ensuing discussion, we shall look at ways the AU can accomplish that for the benefit of the people of Africa.

Almost all countries in Africa are saddled with the common problems of underdevelopment, which we are all aware of, but the information that is not readily available is how efficient different countries in Africa are attempting to solve these problems. So, one of the tasks for the AU will be to compile statistics that identifies countries within Africa, which are able to use S&T to solve the problems of underdevelopment effectively. The R&D facilities in these countries are then assisted by the AU to do intensive and more sophisticated work to increase knowledge in that area of their expertise for the benefit of all Africans. For instance, in Africa, malaria is generally a serious problem, but the capacity to research on malaria to come up with effective solutions may not be available in all countries. This means, it will be prudent for the AU to identify African countries with the infrastructure and research expertise in malaria and assign them the task (with the appropriate resources) to do R&D in malaria for the whole of Africa. In other words Africa will be practicing division of labor with its limited resources to solve some of its key problems.

On the other hand, some of these key problems facing Africa can be solved in the shortest possible time when they are pursued by research and development (R&D) facilities set up by the AU, because these centers of excellence will have the state of the art equipment and highly skilled human resources drawn from across Africa and the developed countries. Currently, some of the key problems pertinent to the development of Africa and the well-being of Africans are in the area of Food Security, Primary Health Care and Energy. Interestingly, these problems can be tackled head-on with Science and Technology. We shall attempt to explain why it will be beneficial to the African people if the AU tackles these problems directly.

Food security means the continuous availability and accessibility of adequate, safe and nourishing food to the people of a country (adapted from WHO). From this definition, we can infer that food security may be a world-wide problem. But for the purposes of this article, we shall limit the discussion to Africa. Currently, Africa has a significant number of undernourished people simply because Africa is not producing enough to feed its people. The reasons for the low production are many, but the main one being the low usage of S&T to transform Agricultural production. We are still depending on rain-fed agriculture, planting crops and rearing animals, which have little resistance to diseases and using outmoded equipment for farming. These prevailing conditions are huge problems which may be difficult to overcome by anyone country and so the AU can step in by establishing facilities (R&D) to develop or adapt to technologies which will dramatically improve yields of food. Such technologies are then passed on/disseminated to individual countries to use. The AU must as well set up policies, which will ensure that these technologies are applied in member countries to increase food production and improve food security.

A high percentage of the health care budget of many African countries deals with preventable diseases. In other words, the Primary Health Care of African countries are more concerned with preventable diseases – mainly communicable diseases. This is not an acceptable situation, because scarce resources which should have been invested in other areas of the health care delivery (for example R&D, training and treatment of non-communicable diseases like cancer, heart disease, kidney disease, diabetes and the like) are devoted to otherwise preventable causes. If we assume that, to a large extent, the governments of Africa are doing their part in educating the public on preventable diseases, then the problem of high expenditures on preventable diseases will more likely be due to the lack of enough or quality medicines to treat the diseases. Incidentally, both of these conditions potentially result in resistance strains of the causative micro-organisms, which further compound the situation, so this is where the AU comes in. It can tackle the problem in two ways, namely, the development of generic drugs in Africa and/or the development of our local medicinal plants. The AU has already taken a bold step in pushing for the idea of development of generic drugs in Africa and a couple or so of African countries like Cameroon have started pursing the idea. The hard fact is that, even in the long-term, only a handful of African countries may be able to pursue this initiative, so what I think has to be done is for the AU to have a regional research and production centers, which will look into developing appropriate technologies for the generic drugs and local medicinal plants, for use by African countries and for export.

Many African countries have not been able to meet their energy needs and that still appears a formidable task for the individual countries to handle. Most of them depend on hydropower for their energy sources, but this source in itself has contributed to the unstable energy supply in African countries. This is because, during droughts volumes of water decrease, and as a result, the amounts of energy being generated from such sources also reduce – sometimes to about 50% or more of the maximum capacity. This means that, alternative renewable energy sources must be explored, for example wind, solar and biomass. But, because it is a heavy task for many individual African countries to pursue, the AU must play a role in it. It can set up an R&D to research into alternative ways of developing clean and renewable energy for Africa as well as for export. Currently, alternative forms of clean and renewable energy development are attractive areas of investment for many countries around the world and the AU can bring a lot of business to Africa if it takes part in that business.

As we are aware, Africa is endowed with a lot of natural resources, that include oil and minerals, which are largely untapped or exported as raw materials. Governments are aware that if they export processed natural resources they stand to gain in terms of more foreign exchange and creation of jobs for the people of the country. However, the situation of exporting unprocessed natural resources has not changed much since the 20th century, and future prospects are not well defined. And so, what can be done to improve this situation is to have the AU set up R&D facilities and huge industries across Africa, which will seek to research and process our raw materials before exporting them. Such activities are likely to bring huge foreign exchange to the continent and create jobs for many Africans.

All these initiatives suggested here, and to be carried out by the AU, will enhance the S&T capability and capacity of Africa. Consequently, they will attract heavy foreign investment, significantly improve the quality of our exported commodities, create more jobs and improve the well-being of people in Africa. The AU will be able to better accomplish these tasks, if it is well resourced, and so the members must consider setting up and contributing to a fund, which will catalyze the projects the AU will undertake for the benefit of the people of Africa. Please look out for the next article.

Chocolate and Kissing Have the Same Effect on the Body, Researchers

Chocolate and kissing have same effect on body and mind

A study in the UK shows that chocolate and kisses arouse the body and the mind in similar fashion though one of them out-stimulate than the other. Needless to say, I don’t need to tell you which one does better.

The team of researchers evaluated six couples and monitored their brain waves when standing with their eyes open, while kissing and while letting a piece of chocolate melt in their mouths. They measured the response of two types of brain activity the alpha bands and beta bands. Alpha bands are activated when you’re feeling relaxed beta bands in excited when you’re feeling alert but anxious. For those of you who enjoy, it is the beta bands that are stimulated when you had a cup

The observation from the study was that both kissing and chocolate eating increased the type of activity signaling alertness and relaxation, but in some individuals, chocolate produced a greater effect, which also lasted longer than that from kissing. At the same time, chocolate also dampened the activity of stress-registering beta bands more than kissing did. Of course you have to note that it likely less stressful to eat chocolate than to kiss in front of a team of researchers.

The conclusion from the study is that chocolate is more stimulating.

Scientifically speaking, this result should not be surprising. The major components in chocolate are sugar and fat, which our brains crave for.

Generally, foods that are high in sugar, fat and salt release dopamine in our brain, which produces a natural high.

Again, chocolate contains caffeine and theobromine which are both mental stimulants and phenylethylamine, an amino acid which raises our blood pressure and heart rate, and tryptophan, also an amino acid which helps release serotonin. In fact, recently, researchers in Switzerland reported that eating about 1.4 ounces of dark chocolate every day for two weeks reduced stress hormones.

So, if you don’t have anybody to kiss on valentine day, pass by a convenient store and get a bite of chocolate.

HAPPY VALENTINE

[ad#Adsense-200by200sq]

Where is Female Genital Mutilation Practiced and What Efforts are Underway to Eradicate it?

By K. Amponsah-Manager

In the previous article, we looked at what female genital mutilation is, why it is practiced and geographical regions where it is practiced. Today’s article will present some figures about FGM in some African countries where it is practiced. FGM is practiced in Asia and other places but these will not be discussed in this article.

The African Union adopted a protocol in 2003 called the In Maputo Protocol with the aim of promoting women’s rights including an end to female genital mutilation and was approved by 15 member states. Even though some countries have officially ratified the Maputo Protocol, FGM is still in practice in several of these countries.

Once a social norm is established, it can be hard for individuals to decide against it. In fact in Senegal for instance, it is known that some parents fear their daughters may be socially marginalized or face reduced marriage prospects if they are denied circumcision. The consequence of this phenomenon is that even though FGM has been illegal since 1999, girls are still subjected to the procedure against their will.

The United States State Department has identified the countries where female genital mutilation is prevalent. Similar information is available from the United Nations WHO sources. Below are the countries in which FGM has been document as a traditional practice:

Country Year Estimated prevalence of FGM in Girls & women 15 – 49 years (%)
Benin 2006 12.9
Burkina Faso 2006 72.5
Cameroon 2004 1.4
Central African Republic 2008 25.7
Chad 2004 44.9
Côte d’Ivoire 2006 36.4
Djibouti 2006 93.1
Egypt 2008 91.1
Eritrea 2002 88.7
Ethiopia 2005 74.3
Gambia 2005/6 78.3
Ghana 2006 3.8
Guinea 2005 95.6
Guinea-Bissau 2006 44.5
Kenya 2008/9 27.1
Liberia 2007 58.2
Mali 2006 85.2
Mauritania 2007 72.2
Niger 2006 2.2
Nigeria 2008 29.6
Senegal 2005 28.2
Sierra Leone 2006 94
Somalia 2006 97.9
Sudan, northern (approximately 80% of total population in survey) 2000 90
Togo 2006 5.8
Uganda 2006 0.8
United Republic of Tanzania 2004 14.6
Yemen 2003 38.2

 

Additional Highlight

Burkina Faso

A law prohibiting FGC was enacted in 1996 and went into effect in February 1997. The Country also ratified the Maputo Protocol in 2006.

Central African Republic

In 1996, the President issued an Ordinance prohibiting FGC throughout the country. A violation of the law is punishable by a fine of approximately US$8–160. No arrests are known to have been made under the so far.

Egypt

Egypt’s Ministry of Health and Population has banned all forms of female genital cutting since 2007.The ministry’s order declared it is ‘prohibited for any doctors, nurses, or any other person to carry out any cut of, flattening or modification of any natural part of the female reproductive system.  However, it remains a culturally accepted practice, and a 2005 study found that over 95% of Egyptian women have undergone some form of FGC. (Egypt death sparks debate on female circumcision”. Reuters. 2007-08-20. http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSL30168862. Retrieved 2009-05-22)

Ghana

Ghana ratified the Maputo Protocol in 2007. Even before this, in 1989 President Rawlings issued a formal declaration against FGC. Article 39 of Ghana’s Constitution also provides in part that traditional practices that are injurious to a person’s health and well being are abolished.

Nigeria

Nigeria ratified the Maputo Protocol in 2005 but there is no federal law banning the practice of FGC in Nigeria.

The United Nations and several non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are intensifying the global campaign to eradicate female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C). As a result of these efforts over the past years, about 6,000 communities have already abandoned the practice of FGM in countries such as Ethiopia, Egypt, Kenya, Senegal, Burkina Faso, the Gambia, Guinea and Somalia.

The campaign to eliminate FGM is a delicate one: it does not work by condemning the practice since that will eventually alienate the women who have gone through the procedure. Rather, a successful approach is the one that embraces the entire community – chiefs, religious leaders, and the local government in a mutually respectful conversation focusing on health consequences of the procedure and emphasizing the human right issue of the tradition.

Other resources: Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) or Female Genital Cutting (FGC): Individual Country Reports”. US State Department. Archived from the original on 2008-01-10. http://web.archive.org/web/20080110005001/http://www.state.gov/g/wi/rls/rep/crfgm/. Retrieved 2008-01-11. (Web archive)

[ad#Adsense-200by90]