Obama to increase engagement with Africa in 2011

President Obama in Ghana
President Obama in Ghana

HONOLULU (AP) — President Barack Obama is quietly but strategically stepping up his outreach to Africa, using this year to increase his engagement with a continent that is personally meaningful to him and important to U.S. interests.

Expectations in Africa spiked after the election of an American president with a Kenyan father. But midway through his term, Obama’s agenda for Africa has taken a backseat to other foreign policy goals, such as winding down the Iraq war, fighting the Taliban in Afghanistan and resetting relations with Russia.

Obama aides believe those issues are now on more solid footing, allowing the president to expand his international agenda. He will focus in Africa on good governance and supporting nations with strong democratic institutions.

Obama delivered that message on his only trip to Africa since taking office, an overnight stop in Ghana in 2009, where he was mobbed by cheering crowds. In a blunt speech before the Ghanaian parliament, Obama said democracy is the key to Africa’s long-term development.

“That is the ingredient which has been missing in far too many places, for far too long,” Obama said. “That is the change that can unlock Africa’s potential. And that is a responsibility that can only be met by Africans.”

The White House says Obama will travel to Africa again and the political calendar means the trip will almost certainly happen this year, before Obama has to spend more time on his re-election bid. No decision has been made on which countries Obama will visit, but deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes said stops will reflect positive democratic models.

The administration is monitoring more than 30 elections expected across Africa this year, including critical contests in Nigeria and Zimbabwe.

“The U.S. is watching and we’re weighing in,” Rhodes said.

John Campbell, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and a former U.S. ambassador to Nigeria, said the different elections give the Obama administration the opportunity to establish clear policies.

The administration “should be less willing to cut slack when those elections are less than free, fair and credible,” Campbell said.

The White House can send that message right now as it deals with the disputed election in Ivory Coast and an upcoming independence referendum in Sudan, which could split Africa’s largest country in two.

Rhodes said the president has invested significant “diplomatic capital” on Sudan, mentioning the referendum in nearly all of his conversations with the presidents of Russia and China, two countries which could wield influence over that Sudan’s government.

When Obama stopped in at a White House meeting last month of his national security advisers and United Nations ambassadors, the first topic he broached was Sudan, not Iran or North Korea. And as lawmakers on Capitol Hill neared the December vote on a new nuclear treaty with Russia, Obama called southern Sudan leader Salva Kiir by telephone to offer support for the referendum.

White House officials believe the postelection standoff in Ivory Coast could be the model for Obama’s stepped-up engagement in Africa.

The president tried to call incumbent President Laurent Gbagbo twice last month, from Air Force One as Obama returned from Afghanistan and then a week later. Neither call reached Gbagbo; administration officials believe the Ivorian leader sought to avoid contact. So Obama wrote Gbagbo a letter, offering him an international role if he stopped clinging to power and stepped down.

But Obama also made clear that the longer Gbagbo holds on, and the more complicit he becomes in violence across the country, the more limited his options become, said a senior administration official. The official insisted on anonymity to speak about administration strategy.

Rhodes said the White House understands that U.S. involvement in African politics can be viewed as meddling. But he said Obama can speak to African leaders with a unique level of candor, reflecting his personal connection to Africa and that his father and other family members have been affected by the corruption that plagues many countries there.

Officials also see increased political stability in Africa as good for long-term U.S. interests — a way to stem the growth of terrorism in east Africa and counterbalance China’s growing presence on the continent.

The U.S. was caught off guard during the 2009 climate summit in Copenhagen when several African countries voted with China and not the U.S., the administration official said. The official said the administration must persuade African nations that their interests are better served by aligning with the U.S.

Share

Gbagbo; Another ugly face for Africa

E. Ablorh-Odjidja (pubhisher, ghana.com)

laurent gbagbo
laurent gbagbo

There was a presidential election in Cote d’Ivoire in December 2010, as required by the peace agreement after the civil war of 2002/2003. The arrangement allowed the then incumbent President Laurent Gbagbo to stretch his hold on power.

He has been in power for ten years and just lost the 2010 presidential election to his rival, Mr. Alassane Ouattara.

Mr. Laurent Gbagbo, however, refuses to leave office, citing a supposed vote rigging by his rival in the northern half of the country as his reason.

The UN has declared Gbagbo the loser after the vote count. Major European countries have backed the UN’s decision.

ECOWAS, the West African regional economic group, has given the nod to Gbagbo’s rival Ouattara as the winner and president elect.

At a meeting held in Abuja on December 7, ECOWAS members went a step further to suspend Cote d’Ivoire from the group because of Gbagbo’s refusal to step down.

The United States and the European Union are considering other sanctions should Gbagbo continue his grip on the presidency.

So far, the situation looks ominous with Mr. Gbagbo’s refusal to back down. Not surprising, he is being encouraged by none other than Russia, the old nemesis of the West in the cold war days.

The BBC quotes diplomats who say “Russia is blocking a Security Council statement endorsing Ivory Coast opposition candidate Alassane Ouattara as president” because Russia claims the UN has no mandate on the issue, notwithstanding the fact that the Russians are aware of the peace agreement that gave the UN the right to supervise affairs in the Ivory Coast election.

Gbagbo knows that Russia’s stance at the UN can easily re-ignite the Ivorian conflict.  With America supporting President-elect Ouattara, chances are that the West African region may erupt into a super-power rivalry that will be costly. But because of personal ambition, Gbagbo is blind to this possible outcome.

Why Russia doesn’t understand the UN position on the matter should not be a mystery. Rather, it should be understood as a classy case of mischief making at the expense of the Cote d’Ivoire and West Africa.

This same Russia that hamstrung the US in the UN on matters leading to the Iraq war is at it again; this time, in another part of the world; all in the name of ideological and super-power struggle.

So the Civil War, as part of Cote d’Ivoire’s history, may rear its ugly head again. But not to blame the Russians, there is no reason why they should love Africa, much less Cote d’Ivoire.

The blame must go to Gbagbo who should know better to help the Cote d’Ivoire come out of this chaotic situation.

For the Russians this much can be said: the messier the situations in Cote d’Ivoire, the better the chances are to turn her into a client state.

But the same cannot be said for ex- President Laurent Gbagbo, a citizen of Cote d’Ivoire and the man with the insatiable ambition.

Ten years in office as president is a lot for most, except leaders in the Third World. And given the odds, the remainder of Gbagbo’s Ivorian generation, within that same time frame, can never constitutionally arise to the presidency because he is in power.

How does one account for the loss of potential leaders if one were to allow an incompetent like Gbagbo to straddle his rule to two or more generations?

Amazing and cruel as it is, the above is lost on Gbagbo. For his personal ambition, the whole of Cote d’Ivoire and generations of citizens after him may likely come to ruin.

Instead of looking at the looming danger ahead, Gbagbo has insolently named himself the president of Cote d’Ivoire even though he lost the 2010 election.

Share

The Hip-hop Star President’s Debut

[ad#Adsense-468×60]

Rapping President Yoweri Museveni
Photographs of Uganda’s President Yoweri Museveni showing him as a rap star are causing a star in his administration. His Press Secretary described it as very damaging.
The images started appearing in the local media after a rap remix of a song the president sang became a hit ahead of presidential elections next year.
Some of the photographs shows the president half-naked and wearing bling.
However, some of the president’s supporters argue that it shows the president is in touch with the interests of the youth.
But others think ” president with tattoos, a president with necklaces, a president half naked’ is just too much.
Mr. Museveni has been President of Uganda since 26 January 1986. He was involved in the war that deposed Idi Amin, ending his rule in 1979.
Rather than work on improving the living conditions of his people, Museveni and some in his cabinet will rather spend their time planning with the American fundamentalist Christian organization The Fellowship (also known as “The Family”) on a path to execute suspected gays and lesbians in Uganda.

[youtube]S7ZZKPxsGDo&feature=related[/youtube]

Museveni can, and I know will, surely rap his way to another term, but it is the unemployed youth on the Uganda street and pregnant women who cannot see a doctor who will pay for his albums with their lives.

[ad#Adsense-200by200sq]

Share

African dictators need tough love too, not cuddling.

 
amin_dada
For far too long, Western governments have cuddled and praised African tyrants even when everything they do and stand for is against the Western definition of democracy. On the other hand, dictators from the Middle East are not indulged with the same policies. They are offered tough love.
 French President Nicolas Sarkozy and Barack Obama both considered Africa as high profile agendas before and after their elections. I am yet to really see this in action. I do not blame either of them for the progress made or otherwise. Surely, I know none of them was prepared for the Greece problems, healthcare battle and backlash from corporate bailout. These circumstances presented them with more pressing priorities than addressing the problems of Africa, so long ago judged unimportant to global affairs.
I admire the manner both Western leaders rebuke dictators and governments who place themselves on the axes of evil. But these 'bad guys' only have to worry if they are not on the African continent. African dictators enjoy rest, peace and comfort that are difficult to describe. In reality, many of Africa’s most repressive dictators have been friends of the West.
In fact, France actually has about 60,000 troops on the African continent most of who are protecting dictators and driving out their rivals, as a result of defense agreement France signed with some countries. Why did President Sarkozy endorsed Ali Bongo to succeed his father in Gabon's disputed presidential election?
Tell me who among these did not (or does not) have a powerful western friend: Robert Mugabe ((Zimbabwe), General Sani Abacha, (Nigeria), Idi Amin, (Uganda),  P.W. Botha (South Africa), General Samuel Doe (Liberia), Francois Duvalier (Haiti), Jean Claude Duvalier (Haiti),Mobutu Sese Seko (Zaire), Charles Taylor (Liberia)
 
At the inauguration of President Barrack Obama, he issued a stern warning to those who cling to power through deceit and corruption and the silencing of dissent. One would expect such a warning to have shivers in Mugabe's spine, and turns Mr. Museveni face red. But it did touch them, because dictators on the African continent know that no one will take them seriously, and their issue won’t even be on the table.
When are we going to see the World Powers hit Pres. Mugabe and Museveni with the same rod that is used on Iranian president or Saddam Hussein.
Share