Human Speech Originated in Africa: Study Suggests

Human speech originated in central and southern Africa, according to new research on languages. It is then said to have spread around the globe alongside migrating human populations.

A comprehensive study of phonemes, or the perceptually distinct units of sound that differentiate words, used in 504 human languages reveals that the dialects containing the most phonemes are spoken in Africa, those with the fewest in South America and on tropical islands in the Pacific Ocean.

This pattern of phoneme usage around the world mirrors the pattern of human genetic diversity, which also declined as humans expanded their range from Africa to colonize other regions, reveals an analysis in the 15 April issue of Science

Data compiled by Quentin Atkinson from the University of Auckland, shows a movement of languages out of the African continent to other areas of the world. Atikson says, “It seems like the obvious explanation is that people carried language – along with their genes – with them as they expanded out of Africa.”

Atkinson’s findings further reveal that areas that were most recently colonised adapt fewer phonemes into their local languages while regions that have hosted human life for a long time still use the most phonemes, sub-Saharan Africa in particular.

According to Atkinson’s study, the highest levels of phonemic diversity are found in language families associated with the people of Southeast Asia. His research frames comple language as one of the earliest archaeological symbols of mordern human culture, indicating that it was a key cultural innovation that ultimately led to our colonisation of the globe.

In conclusion Atkinson says: “Modern humans are just one big, genetic family with a single common ancestor, one of the things I like about these results is that, to the extent that language is an identity, we all seem to be part of one big, cultural family as well.”

Share

Early Humans Began in Southern Africa, Study Suggests

By Mark Kinver Science and environment reporter, BBC News

Modern humans may have originated from southern Africa, an extensive genetic study has suggested.

Data showed that hunter-gatherer populations in the region had the greatest degree of genetic diversity, which is an indicator of longevity.

It says that the region was probably the best location for the origin of modern humans, challenging the view that we came from eastern Africa.

The study appears in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Hunter-gatherer groups in southern Africa were among the most genetically diverse populations

“Africa is inferred to be the continent of origin for all modern human populations,” the international team of researchers wrote.

“But the details of human prehistory and evolution in Africa remain largely obscure owing to the complex histories of hundreds of distinct populations.”

‘Very exciting’

Co-author Brenna Henn, from Stanford University, California, said the team’s study – the most comprehensive of its kind – reached two main conclusions.

“One is that there is an enormous amount of diversity in African hunter-gatherer populations, even more diversity than there is in agriculturalist populations,” she told BBC News.

This is a landmark study, with far more extensive data on… hunter gatherer groups than we have ever had before, but I am cautious about localising origins from it”

“These hunter/gatherer groups are highly structured and are fairly isolated from one another and probably retain a great deal of different genetic variations – we found this very exciting.”

Dr Henn added: “The other main conclusion was that we looked at patterns of genetic diversity among 27 (present-day) African populations, and we saw a decline of diversity that really starts in southern Africa and progresses as you move to northern Africa.”

She explained that the team’s modelling was consistent with the serial founder effect. This refers to a loss of genetic variation when a new population is established by a very small number of individuals from the original, larger population.

“Populations in southern Africa have the highest genetic diversity of any population, as far as we can tell.

“So this suggests that this might be the best location for (the origins) of modern humans.”

‘Landmark study’

Chris Stringer, a leading palaeontologist based at the Natural History Museum, London, said: “The new paper… suggests that the genes of the Namibian and Khomani bushmen (southern Africa), Biaka pygmies (Central Africa) and the Sandawe (East Africa) appear to be the most diverse, and by implication these are the most ancient populations of Homo sapiens.”

Professor Stringer, who was not involved in the study, added: “This is a landmark study, with far more extensive data on… hunter gatherer groups than we have ever had before, but I am cautious about localising origins from it.”

He said that the ranges of these groups were currently quite limited, but rock paintings by ancient populations that had been linked to the Bushman hinted that they were once far more widespread.

“It seems more likely that the surviving hunter-gatherer groups are now localised remnants of populations that formerly ranged across much of sub-Saharan Africa 60,000 years ago,” he told BBC News.

Professor Stringer said that he no longer thought that there was a single “Garden of Eden” where we evolved. Instead, he said, “distinct populations in ancient Africa probably contributed to the genes and behaviours that make up modern humans”.

[ad#Adsense-200by200sq]

Share

Unusual Discovery in South African Orchard

Andrews Bromi,  TalkAfrique.com

Is there a faster, cheaper method to pick  sweetest oranges in the orchard? Ask a baboon.

A group of baboons in South Africa is being recognized as capable of sniffing out a new, sweeter variety of orange. Their speed and accuracy at gobbling up quickly ripening fruit has led to a discovery of what is believed to be a new type of tangerine.

Alwyn van der Merwe, production director of ALG Estates near Citrusdal, South Africa, said the farm noticed that baboons that come down to the farm from nearby mountains each year always went to feed from a particular tree among the thousands in the orchards. The animals stripped the tree clean of fruit well before others in the orchard were in season, he said.

“At closer inspection we discovered that the brix [sweetness grade] of this particular minneola, a soft citrus variety, was much higher than the rest of the orchard and that it started bearing fruit at least three weeks earlier than expected,” van der Merwe said.

” It was clearly a case of a spontaneous mutation in the orchard, which would have gone unnoticed were it not for the baboons,” van der Merwe is quoted as saying.

Growers have begun grafting shoots from the baboon’s favorite tree onto other root stock and hope to be producing large quantities of the sweeter minneola in a few years.

And he knows the baboons will likely be the first customers.

“I’m sure they will have a feast one day when we produce a whole orchard of these early sweet minneolas,” he said.

Share

Did first humans originate from Afican or Middle East?

Professor Avi Gopher from the Institute of Archeology of Tel Aviv University holds an ancient tooth that was found at an archeological site near Rosh Haain, Central Israel
Professor Avi Gopher from the Institute of Archeology of Tel Aviv University holds an ancient tooth that was found at an archeological site near Rosh Haain, Central Israel

A news scientific discovery may force libraries to burn some old biology books on the evolution of modern man from their shelves. Scientists have just discovery a 400,000-year-old human remains which raises a lot of questions.

Previously,  researchers believed that homo sapiens, which are the direct descendants of modern man, evolved in Africa about 200,000 years ago and gradually migrated north, through the Middle East, to Europe and Asia.

The new discovery, which came out from a study by an Israeli university researchers could compel scientists to revise the earlier theories.

Archeologists from Tel Aviv University say eight human-like teeth found in the Qesem cave near Rosh Ha’Ayin – 10 miles from Israel’s international airport – are 400,000 years old, from the Middle Pleistocene Age, making them the earliest remains of homo sapiens yet discovered anywhere in the world.

The size and shape of the teeth are very similar to those of modern man. Until now, the earliest examples found were in Africa, dating back only 200,000 years.

The report which is published in the American Journal of Physical Anthropology, suggest that modern man did not originate in Africa as previously believed, but in the Middle East.

The teeth is the part of the human skeleton that survive the longest.

The researchers hope to make more discoveries that would shed further light on human evolution in prehistoric times.
In conclusion, the “Out of Africa” theory will be subjected to strong debate in the days and years ahead.

Share

One for two: Africa has two species of elephants

If at high school biology you were taught that there are two species of elephants — the African and the Asian —it’s time to forget that.

A new research shows that the “African elephant” is actually two species. These two species are as evolutionarily different as goat and sheep are from one another. It’s a surprising degree of divergence that has just been reported.

The study, published in this week’s issue of the journal PLoS Biology was conducted by teams from Harvard, the University of Illinois and the University of York in Britain. The evolutionary divergence was identified by analyzing the DNA of the living elephant species and two of their extinct evolutionary cousins, the woolly mammoth and mastodon.

The study suggests the species separated several million years ago, about the same time that humans diverged from chimps.

The forest elephant is smaller, and is sometimes referred to as the “dwarf African elephant,” standing at about 8.2 feet high compared with the savanna elephant’s 11.5 feet, and weighing about half as much. The forest elephant also has straighter tusks and oval-shaped ears.

The savanna elephant weighs between 6 and 7 tons, roughly double the weight of the forest elephant.

The African elephant is listed as endangered by the U.S. Endangered Species Act, and splitting the population into two different species places the forest elephant in much more dreadful category.

Share

Aliens May Be Living Among Us

By James Morgan , Science reporter

Never mind Mars, alien life may be thriving right here on Earth, a major science conference has heard.

Our planet may harbour forms of “weird life” unrelated to life as we know it, according to Professor Paul Davies, a physicist at Arizona State University.
This “shadow life” may be hidden in toxic arsenic lakes or in boiling deep sea hydrothermal vents, he says.
He has called on scientists to launch a “mission to Earth” by trawling hostile environments for signs of bio-activity.
Weird life could even be living among us, in forms which we don’t yet recognise, he told the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) meeting in Chicago.
“We don’t have to go to other planets to find weird life.
“It could be right in front of our noses – or even in our noses,” said the physicist.
“It is entirely reasonable to expect we will find a shadow biosphere here on Earth.
“But nobody has actually taken the trouble to look.
“The question is why? The cost is not expensive – it would be a fraction of the money we spend searching for extraterrestrial life.”
‘Second genesis’
Professor Davies was one of the speakers at a symposium exploring the possibility that life has evolved on Earth more than once.
The descendants of this “second genesis” may have survived until today in a “shadow biosphere” which is beyond our radar because its inhabitants have biochemistry so different from our own.
“All our microscopes are customised for life as we know it – so it’s no surprise that we haven’t found microbes with different biochemistry,” said Professor Davies.
“We don’t quite know how weird life would look. It’s as wide as the imagination and that’s why it’s really hard to look for.”
If it exists, weird life could be based on DNA and RNA – but with a slightly different genetic code or different amino acids.
At the other end of the spectrum, we could find creatures which have more drastic differences.
“Maybe one of the elements life uses – carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, phosphorus – could be replaced by something else,” said Professor Davies.
“When I say that, everyone immediately thinks of silicon life – because of Star Trek. But I’m not talking about anything that drastic.
“For example, most of the jobs that can be done by phosphorus can be done by arsenic.”
Arsenic may be poisonous to humans, but it has chemical properties which might make it ideal in a microbe’s machinery, he said.
‘Mission to Earth’
So how do we go about hunting for something we have never seen before?
“There are two possibilities,” said Prof Davies, Director of the BEYOND Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science.
“One is that weird life is ecologically isolated, in niches beyond the reach of mankind.”
In this case, we must begin trawling the world’s most inhospitable environments – deserts, salt lakes, and areas of high pressure, temperature or UV radiation.
We could have a ‘mission to Earth’. There’s a big long list of places we could be looking,” observed Professor Davies
For example, if we are looking for arsenic life, we could head for environments which are both arsenic rich and phosphorus poor – such as deep ocean vents.
“There is also a heavily contaminated lake in California which is arsenic rich – Mono Lake – and we do find microbes in there which get their energy from arsenic.
“But they don’t actually incorporate the arsenic into themselves. They spit it back out again. They smoke but they don’t inhale.”
On the other hand, it could be that “weird life” is actually all around us – intermingled with carbon based life.
“In that case it’s going to be really hard to detect – you have to find some way of filtering everything else out.”
This laborious process has been used to search for unknown organisms in seawater – by painstakingly filtering everything else away.
If we did discover something unprecedented, “we’d all start arguing” said Professor Davies, a theoretical physicist.
“The question would be whether this life was truly different, or whether there was a common precursor a deep branch on the main tree of life.
“Also, how do we know we are dealing with separate Earth genesis and not a Mars genesis?
“We know rocks do get traded between the two planets, and life could hitch a ride.
“Personally, I’m only interested in establishing whether life happened more than once. If we find it has happened twice from scratch then its going to have happened all around the universe.
“It’s going to be teeming with life and there’s a very good chance we are not alone.”
deap sea creatures
Life in the lab
Another way to determine what alternative life might look like is to try to invent it ourselves.
If we can create new molecules which can behave in life-like way, we may then go out and look for these in the environment, says Professor Steven Benner, of the University of Florida.
His team have created perhaps the closest yet to a man-made alternative form of life.
“We are announcing the first example of an artificial synthetic chemical system capable of Darwinian evolution,” he told the conference.
“Is it alive? Well, I can tell you that it is not self-sustaining.
“You have to have a graduate student stand there and feed it from time to time, but it is evolving.”
The molecule is essentially a modified version of our own DNA double helix – but with six “letters” in its genetic alphabet, instead of four.
These nucleotides pair up in strands, which can replicate, though only with the help of polymerase enzymes and heat.
“Sometimes mistakes are made in pairing and these mistakes are maintained in the next generation – it is evolving,” said Prof Brenner.
“The next step is to apply natural selection to it, to see if it can evolve under selective pressure.
“The accepted definition of life is a molecule capable of Darwinian evolution, so we are trying to put together molecules that are capable of doing it.”
But he questioned whether our definition of “living” is perhaps too “Earth-centric”.
“Remember – just because you are a chemical system which is self-sustaining and capable of Darwinian evolution, that doesn’t mean that is the universal definition of life,” he said.
Share

African Fossils Suggest Complex Life Arose Early

By Gwyneth Dickey (Science News)
Researchers have found what may be the earliest evidence of multicellular life on Earth. Large fossils uncovered in 2.1 billion-year-old rock from Gabon, in western Africa, appear to be incipient examples of macroscopic life in what was then a sea of single-celled microbes.
A three dimensional X-ray image of the outer (left) and inner (right) body of a fossil from the Gabonese site. Scientists believe that multicellular life really took off much later, in the great expansion of animal body plans known as the Cambrian explosion 545 million years ago.
“The discovery is fantastic because it shows the existence of multicellular fauna 1.5 billion years earlier than what we know,” says team leader Abderrazak El Albani, a sedimentologist and paleobiologist at the University of Poitiers in France. “This is important to understand the evolution of life on Earth.”
Some researchers have suggested multicellular organisms arose as early as 1.6 billion years ago, but the evidence is controversial. El Albani and his colleagues were thus surprised to find large fossils in the newly excavated ancient Gabonese rocks. So far, the team has collected over 250 specimens that range in size from 1 to 12 centimeters.
Using detailed X-ray imaging called microtomography, the team created three-dimensional images of the fossils inside and out. The organisms had flat, round, soft bodies, with slits around the edges and complex, patterned folds inside. The creatures belong to new species that have never been described, the team reports in the July 1 Nature.
Other researchers agree that the large size, thickness, and three-dimensionality of the organisms suggest that they were, indeed, multicellular. “There does seem to be something more than just a clonal colony of bacteria,” says paleobiologist Philip Donoghue of the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom.
El Albani and his team believe the complex patterns and folding mean that cells must have coordinated their growth through chemical signaling, like all multicellular organisms do. The fossils could even be the first examples of eukaryotes, cells with membrane-bound nuclei, according to the team.
But since actual cells were long gone from the sediments, the team had to prove these fossils were not simply mineral formations that looked like animals.
Pyrite, a sulfur-containing mineral also known as fool’s gold, filled the fossils, providing evidence that sulfate-breathing bacteria had eaten away at living tissue. Carbon and sulfur isotopes also confirmed the fossils’ organic origins.
Further analysis showed that the fossils couldn’t have been more recent organisms that burrowed deep into sediments, because the surrounding rock was the same inside and outside the organisms’ folds.
Rock chemistry indicates the organisms lived about 30 to 40 meters deep in sea water. They likely breathed oxygen, which by that time had been building up in the oceans and atmosphere for 350 million years. Donoghue says it’s exciting that scientists are “edging back” the fossil record toward this so-called “great oxidation event” 2.5 billion years ago.
The research team plans to do more experiments to determine how these organisms lived and how to further categorize them
Share

New scientific finding on mosquitoes is not good news on the malaria front

Mosquito sp. Anopheles gambiae is responsible for malaria

The research team of researchers from the University Of Notre Dame, the J.C. Venter Institute, Washington University and the Broad Institute are reporting that two strains of mosquitoes responsible for malaria in Africa are evolving at an unexpected rate into genetically distinct species. This is not good news as it will further complicate the tedious fight against malaria by creating a situation where strategies and medicines developed against malaria may not be effective against both strains

The studies were reported in the magazine Science. The two issues (Science 22 October 2010:Vol. 330. no. 6003, pp. 512 – 514; Science 4 October 2002:Vol. 298. no. 5591, pp. 115 – 117) suggest that the evolution process is occurring faster than previously thought, and point to already substantial differences in the two strains. The two species already able to exploit different habitats.

Malaria kills one child every 30 seconds worldwide, according to World Health Organization. The incidence could be higher in sub-Saharan African.

The work focused on the Anopheles gambiae, the mosquito that is the most transmitter of malaria in sub-Saharan Africa. The study describes the two strains as “M” and “S” strains of the “Anopheles gambiae mosquito

What they found was that the mosquitoes are diverging into two different incipient species, which are called M and S forms. Physically, the two forms are cannot be distinguished, they are and able to interbreed, but their DNAs are diverging into different directions. Their behaviors are different under different conditions.

The ‘M’ form is usually found in around permanent bodies of water and spends most of its life in water environment. This means that it can thrive in dry areas that are normally not good habitats for malaria transmitting mosquitoes.

The S form is used to small, short-lived water bodies and breeds well during the rainy season. It is clear how these ‘tricks’ by the mosquito could undermine current efforts to combat the disease.

Work is ongoing to sequence the genome of the two forms of mosquitoes which could help us to decipher why they are different and how to devise ways to combat them more effectively.

Share