Posted on

GLOCALISATION: A Development Model for Africa

Glocalisation is both an idea and a process. As an idea, ‘it refers to a set of principles wherein developing sovereign national states in the Global community, will formulate policies of regional and local content for the actualization of development in their respective regions. As a process, ”Glocalisation” is the beginning of a new era for developing states to attain optimum development vis-à-vis globalizing the Local, and localizing the global’.

In other words, leaders and policy makers of developing nations must acknowledge that workable solutions to the challenges facing their regions must best be sourced ‘locally’ vis-à-vis globalizing the local, and localizing the global. Granted, the world is a Global Village. In the pre- Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) world, economic advancement was not demographically defined; rather it came out of the level of the scientific and technological know-how each country was exposed to. The advanced countries of the western hemisphere hoarded as much scientific and technological information as possible leaving the Third World nations in the dust. Countries with large populations like the BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India & China) experienced major hiccups: we can well remember the near collapse of the Brazilian currency in the 1980s, the widespread hunger in India and China (not forgetting that Japan once colonized China, but today China has overtaken Japan as the world’s 2nd largest economy).

However, access to scientific and technological information has known very little restriction today, as the nations above (BRIC) made the best of it, investing heavily on education, the process through which intellectual capital is built. This has to a large extent facilitated rapid growth and development of these nations especially those with common origin, interest, culture, philosophies amongst others. Needless to state why we have nations forming alliances to promote their common interest such as the European Union, African Union, Asian Tigers, etc.

Suffice to state that the development of nations as mentioned above can largely be attributed to the application of principles inherent in the concept of GLOCALISATION which requires an independent nation(s) though recognizing her inclusion in the comity of nations, design and articulate a policy framework of local content for the attainment of her developmental goals. Consider a research report by Goldman Sachs (2003): The rise of the BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India & China). The report as originally published predicted that China’s economy will surpass Germany in the next few years, Japan by 2015, the United States by 2041. India’s growth rate will be the highest – not China’s- and it will overtake Japan (today the world’s second-largest economy) by 2032. Taken together, the BRIC could be larger than the United States and the developed economies of Europe within 40years.

According to the Goldman Sachs report, China’s economy overtook Germany’s economy, a year earlier than expected, and overtook Japan in July 2010. It is now believed that the Chinese economy will overtake the United States by 2027. With India accounting for 10 of the 30 fastest growing urban areas in the world and 700million people moving to cities by 2050, its influence on the world economy will be bigger and quicker than was implied in 2003 analysis.(source: Wikipedia)

Closely following the BRIC prediction is the 2004 Report on the NEXT ELEVEN {N-11}, where Nigeria is included among eleven nations warming up to also assert themselves in the global economic map. While China overtakes the United States as the greatest economic power in the world by 2047, Nigeria would become the 20th largest economy by 2025 and the 12th by 2050 ahead of G-7 giants, Italy and Canada.

Successive leaders coupled with a consistent local developmental plan have been able to take the countries in focus above to their present world status. India as been able to localize the global especially in the area of alternative health care. Most countries around the world seek after India’s healthcare expertise resulting in a rapid economic and social development to the nation. Japan has taken the world in the field of technology vis-à-vis globalizing the local, and localizing the global. Most of Japanese products compete favorably world over with those from the United States, U.K, Germany, Spain, just to mention a few. Same is true of Algeria and South-Africa, nations in Africa that have achieved remarkable development due to a consistent Local framework vis-à-vis globalizing the local, and localizing the global. South Africa hosted the famous FIFA world cup tournament in 2010, as the first Africa nation. Dubai of the United Arab Emirates hosts a ‘prototype’ of the world trade center (New York); a center for trade and tourism in Africa is non existent.

Needless to state that the countries making progress have learned to adapt international opportunities to their local benefits. Much can be learned by developing nations especially in Africa in achieving national and continental development from the concept of Glocalisation

Glocalisation will strengthen and give the needed impetus for Africans to proffer local solutions to the challenges facing the continent. Africa is well positioned on the world stage being endowed with numerous human and material resources to address its challenges with little or no external influence. While African owes the Global community of which it is an integral part for some of her achievement in commerce, healthcare, insurance, transportation, etc, much of the desired results yet to be recorded by the continent especially in the area of governance, Human Rights, freedom and legality can realistically be attained with the principle of Glocalisation.

Presently, a major challenge facing the continent of Africa is the political upheaval in IVORY COAST where the incumbent president – Lauren Gbagbo lost in the nation’s last general election to his opposition leader- Alassane Quattara and insists on holding on to power despite calls from the international community and regional heads that he hands over. Interestingly, African Leaders under the auspices of AFRICAN UNION have succeeded in the past in ousting a defiant and failed leader out of power. Examples are sierra-lone, Liberia, Kenya just to mention few. ECOWAS, a regional community of which Ivory Coast is a signatory to with Nigeria as its seat of power is about to use military measure as a last resort to make the vote of the people count if the incumbent insists on not vacating office. Much of this is of interest to political observers and people around the world, especially Africans. Challenges as above are addressed locally with consideration to external measures.  In addition, the age-long Niger Delta region crisis in Nigeria over resource control appears to be halted in 2010 when the government in power granted ‘AMNESTY’ or ‘STATE PARDON’ to the militants, leading to an unprecedented handing over of arms and ammunition by the aggrieved youths of the community. Many benefited from the federal government Rehabilitation Programs for the ex-militants which empowered the youths in various skills and trade. That in itself was a practical demonstration of principles inherent in Glocalisation.

African leaders must come to terms with the peculiar challenges facing the continent and in the spirit of the African continent, proffer local solutions to the continent’s challenges. This is the time for African leaders to call back home Africans in the Diaspora to contribute towards the development of the continent using their international exposure and experience in all field of human endeavors. This will in turn translate into globalizing the local, and localizing the global for the benefit of the continent and its people.

The Millennium Development Goals (MDGS) of the third world nations will be realized only if the principles of Glocalisation are applied. African Leaders must consolidate effort towards the actualization of the MGDs. In my view, African leaders through the African Union should develop a long term development plan of Local Content geared towards addressing Poverty, Education, Mortality, Human Rights, etc., which are the issues embedded in the MDGs. Hence, there should be a’ Master-Plan’ out of which regional bodies in Africa-(ECOWAS, SADC) draw their individual plans. The MGDs should be a ‘driving force’ for African leaders to take the continent to its next level in the global community. Imagine a time when the western region of Africa connects the East, South and North through an integrated Rail system….(AFROLINE), when an African University is rated amongst the best five in the world; when a common mechanized agricultural system is developed; when the average African lives above one dollar per-day; when we can rely on our indigenous medical experts in handling terminal ailments such as cancer; and when our leaders plays high value in service devoid of corruption, violence, abuse of power and so on. All these can be achieved when principles inherent in Glocalisation are holistically applied in Africa.

Share
Posted on

Globalization And The Development of Africa

The Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary 6th Edition defines the word global as a phenomenon that includes many parts. Moving a step further from this definition, globalization could be described as a concept or phenomenon that includes all parts of the world and also operates around the world; hence the whole world is looked upon as a single community that is connected by electronic communication systems to form a global village.

Globalization goes a step further from these concepts; it also implies and provides the building blocks for the emergence of a homogenous world culture. It is often referred to as the new world order.

It must, however, be argued that globalization as a concept originated from the more developed western countries, as they argued that the economic backwardness of the world in general and the developing countries in particular was a product of the isolation of the developing countries from the world economy. This ” backwardness” it was argued could easily be remedied by greater global economic and cultural integration.

The motives for global integration [globalization] includes

  • The enhanced efficiency in production made possible by increased specialization in accordance with the law of comparative advantage.
  • Increased production levels due to better exploitation of economies of scale made possible by the increased size of the market.
  • An improved international bargaining position made possible by the larger size, leading to better terms of trade
  • Enforced changes in economic efficiency brought about by enhanced competition.
  • Changes affecting both the amount and quality of the factors of production due to technological advances.

Whatever its political connotations, globalization, fundamentally, is an economic phenomenon. Desire becomes demand only with the addition of purchasing power; this is true of countries as well as individuals. These economic realities enable countries to pursue their political policies of self interest with varying degrees of success.

Hence, in this discourse, I shall consider the economic and political dimensions of globalization with all other considerations indirect or subordinate to these dimensions.

Globalization and the development of Africa:

The inequality of nations challenges the theory of globalization as a world system; it is common knowledge that African countries fall within the category of countries regarded as underdeveloped. If we examine the structure of an underdeveloped economy, typically such an economy is an importer of capital and technology as well as consumer goods from the developed world.  These imported capital and technology play a crucial role in its development.

Domestic substitution for foreign capital and foreign technical know-how is a very costly affair often indeed impossible. This is true whether we think of replication or genuine substitution allowing for the different needs of a poorer country. For most African countries, the export sector is the leading sector which sets the pace for development and shapes the rest of the economy, both the pattern and pace of growth. Typically, size by size, the poorer a country, the more dependent it is on foreign markets, and foreign sources of supply. If the export sector stagnates, so that the inflow of resources from abroad is constrained, the pace of growth and rate of structural change respond accordingly. These factors are highly sensitive to such decline in the availability of foreign resources.

The terms on which the developing countries can obtain foreign exchange, capital and technology reflect the relationship between the rich and poor countries in the world economy.

In the face of the existing distribution of economic power, it is the rich countries who determine the terms, because in the short run, the developing countries in Africa need the products and services of the developed countries much more than the latter needs the output of the former.

Recent statistics obtained have in fact confirmed that Africa’s share in the total world trade is just about 1%.  This can be appreciated if we take a look at the international commodity and markets factors, African countries are mainly price takers until very recent trade negotiations and trade policy formulations .This dependence of African countries on developed countries/western countries has far reaching consequences for the development prospects of the former. The existence of such great disparities and one-sided dependence has placed a moral question on the concept of globalization.

Poverty in African countries also reflects essentially the technological gap between them and the rich countries. Even the oil-rich countries are no exceptions in this regard. This results in the developing countries inability to produce by themselves goods which require modern technical know-how and even less to develop an alternative technology substitute.

The trade patterns of African countries show that they usually export crude or processed agriculture or mineral based products. These countries have not succeeded in adapting or replicating for their own countries the technological development that have occurred in the rich countries. This is another fact that we are confronted with that has tended to negate the principle of globalization vis a vis the development of Africa.  Although ,the division of the world into developed and underdeveloped countries is an oversimplification ,vast differences in natural endowment ,economic conditions, cultural heritage, social organizations and political traditions are factors that have also tended to broaden the inequalities that exist between the developed countries and Africa in particular ,hence globalization has exacerbated “global poverty” particularly in these African countries

The difference in the material conditions of people living in various parts of the world is reflected graphically in two socio-economic indicators the rate of national literacy and the per capita energy consumption rate. Together these two indices provide a telling measure of sophistication of the production structure of a nation, and they are much significant than indicators based on the sectoral origin of gross domestic product [GDP}.

Literacy in African countries is considerably lower than that in developed/western societies as is per capita energy consumption. This structural characteristic of the economy reflects the inability of African countries to exploit their economic potential and also to enjoy the so called “benefits of globalization”

In fact, about 40 African countries fall within the purview of the poorest countries in the world. The global economic turmoil of recent years has affected developing countries with particular severity. In Africa, the free working of market forces in no way enables countries to counterview the constraints of globalization and multinational capital. The proponents of globalization must recognize that only global redistribution can ensure the development of Africa and that the developing world’s primary needs are far more social rather than private capital accumulation, which globalization entails.

Another dimension to the issue of globalization vis a vis the development of Africa is the activities[s] of multinational companies [MNCs]. These MNCs are agents of developed nations who are advocating a greater role for the free play of market forces without due regard to social factors within these African nations. As a result of these factors, Africa stands the risk of distorted development.

The calamities which this “new world order” is visiting on billions of people around the globe, particularly African nations cannot be quantified. As a matter of fact, globalization has led to a situation whereby the top 20% of humanity now controls 84% of the world’s wealth, while the bottom 20% makes do with a shade of over 1% of the world’s wealth.

The danger in which “wholesale” globalization portends for African countries and their development has been elucidated by Susan George, a Harvard trained economist, in the Lugarno Report [2003]. By the way, Lugano is a town located in Switzerland and sometime in 2003, a group of intellectuals [drawn from all continents in the world] gathered in the resort town to brainstorm about the world’s problems. They came out with what is now referred to as the Lugano report in which they documented the “evils” of globalization vis a vis the developing nations and particularly Africa in which they summarized that the main beneficiaries of globalization are its proponents and the more developed capitalist /Western nations, and that in order to sustain it through the next century and beyond, a sustained strategy needs to be vigorously pursued and implemented.

These has already started: it includes the reduction of population in African countries through the Population Reduction Strategy[PRS], which includes the promotion of genocidal conflicts, and wars, the curtailment of humanitarian assistance to victims of hunger, famine, epidemics and other natural and unnatural tragedies. The purging of the UN of notions like human rights, and equality of nations, the systematic degradation of the quality of foods and medicine sent to 3rd world countries, etc.

In conclusion, it is imperative to remind those who control and direct the free market globalization, that what Africa really needs for development is GLOBAL REDISTRIBUTION, and not this presently skewed globalization.  It is this global redistribution that can bring about greater global peace and security. To African nations, I recommend to them a renaissance or better still African Renaissance as the development of Africa does not lie in the hands of anybody but Africans themselves

Share