When Will Might Make Right End?

So many times in our political life in the world the issue of might makes right takes precedence over logical reasoning. When George Bush launched his offensive on Saddam Hussein, it was the refusal of Saddam to destroy his “weapon of mass destruction”. The American leader, George Bush believed strongly Saddam’s refusal would have hindered the peace in the world. The entire world organizations were against the United States of America attacked on Iraq. The Americans exerted all their might to the extend they witnessed Saddam being executed. The entire scenario was might makes right. No country in the world would have executed such a notable task.

Realistically, the world politics gives credence to the United Nations decision especially once it is supported by the super power of the world, the United States of America. No country dares to violate the decision of the Security Council members. Whether you are right personally, they have the decision of right in the world body politics. Can you imagine the world has considered AIDS as the only major disease in the world that needs serious attention? Disease has been considered “POLITICAL DISEASE”.

During the course of the cold war, they were right when they were supporting insurgents throughout Africa trying to get support. Ambassador Herman Cohen stated that they provided so much money to Samuel Doe to have an easy passage of support to Jonas Savimbe. The Liberian route was the direct conduit for Jonas operation.

Let me ask few questions on the issue of Charles Taylor.

  1. How was Charles Taylor released from the United States of America prison to prosecute civil war in Liberia?
  2. Why the United States government did not turn Charles Taylor over to Samuel Kanyan Doe?

They were right for releasing Taylor because there was an interest at stake that needed solution.

Today, they are interacting with a rebellious government in Libya because their interest is to get Ghaddafi out of power and ensure that a government that suits their interest takes the mantle of power. The issue of interacting with rebel government is justifiable. In fact, the Secretary of State of the United States of America has asked African government to renounce diplomatic relationship with Libya simply because of their interest. This is might makes right. The Liberian President broke the diplomatic relationship in England during a state visit. The African Leaders cannot fight against the powers because of the limited might they have. It will not be possible for any country in the world to invade the United States of America to arrest a criminal, only the USA can execute such a function in any part of the world. See how bin laden was arrested and killed. They have no regret for the action because they have the might all times to protect their interest.

What has strengthened the issue of might makes right is the concept of dependency syndrome. Too many times African and developing countries relied on the super power for every substantial capacity that will develop them. In spite of the resources in these African countries they are still depending on the super power in the world to make decision for them. There are cases where the leaders of these countries exploit their own home land and deposit it in these countries to live well with their families. How will might makes right not be strengthened? Might makes right can gradually end when the African and developing leaders allow rationality and commitment prevail in the execution of their functions.

Share

The Way Libya May Go Next

Obama has spoken, Sarcozy has made up his mind, NATO has taken the lead; all in a bid to get the common enemy they called Maoummar Gaddafi out.  But rebels fighting from Benghazi flank are crude in their approach as they lack regimental command structure. They have demonstrated that they want to take-over power, taking the advantage of the No-Fly-Zone clause of the UN resolution 1973. But Gaddafi troop are reclaiming areas like Adjabya and Sirte, earlier acclaimed to have overrun by the rebels, as more Libyan refugees in their thousands invading the small Italian Island of Lampedusa, Egypt and Tunisia, to escape the crisis.

While the rebels beat a retreat in the face of fierce attacks from Gaddafi’s troops, the prominent actors and top decision-makers in the regime are defecting to the opposition’s side.  Moussa Kuossa, Ghaddafi foreign minister made a surprise entrance into UK, two days ago, and he was followed by others. Most of the defectors were staunch supporters of the tyrannical rule of Gaddafi all these years. Gaddafi is a mean man, he knows what the end would be sooner or later, thus; he would left no stone unturned in dealing with those he referred to as ‘cockroaches, rats, and drug addicts’. Whatever anyone thinks, the end is near for Gaddafi; either he gives way for peaceful transition or he faces humiliation as did Iraqi-once -strongman, Saddam Hussein.

Whatever the stakes are, there is every likelihood that those men bombing and firing missiles from war planes would have to come down; do some infantry job to keep Gaddafi men in check. Or they have to negotiate a soft-landing plank for Gaddafi to step aside. Anything short of this would still give the Libya maximum ruler more opportunity, to kill thousands of the civilian population the No-Fly-Zone is to protect. Because the 1973 is vague and open, various interpretations are being derived from it to achieve a specific purpose. Why is the UN resolution 1973 clause not being applied in Barhain, Syria or Yemen?

Share