South Sudan Has the World’s Worst Maternal mortality Rate

South Sudan has the worst reported maternal mortality rate in the world.

“More women die in child birth, per capita, in South Sudan, than in any country in the world,” says Caroline Delany, a health specialist with the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) in South Sudan which is funding a raft of maternal health programmes.

A 2012 report entitled Women’s Security in South Sudan: Threats in the Home by Geneva-based think-tank Small Arms Survey (SAS) says a national survey carried out in 2006 indicating 2,054 deaths per 100,000 live births may have been an underestimation.

“Many deaths are not reported, in part because 90 percent of women give birth away from formal medical facilities and without the help of professionally trained assistants,” it said.

Childbirth and pregnancy, rather than conflict, are the nation’s biggest killers of girls and women. Continue reading “South Sudan Has the World’s Worst Maternal mortality Rate”

Share

SOUTH SUDAN-SUDAN: Thousands Still Stranded Despite Airlifts

JUBA, 14 June 2012 (IRIN) – Thousands of South Sudanese remain stranded in Sudan or internally displaced en route to their homes or relatives in South Sudan, following the final International Organization of Migration (IOM) airlift of people from Sudan to South Sudan on 6 June.

IOM airlifted 11,840 people in 24 days from Kosti transit station in Sudan to Juba in South Sudan after the government of Sudan decided that ethnic South Sudanese should formalize their status in the north or leave.

The latest estimates show that 38,000 South Sudanese are living in makeshift conditions at “departure points” around the Sudanese capital Khartoum, waiting for transport, according to the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR). Thousands more are displaced within South Sudan in makeshift housing, temporary shelter, transit camps and way stations, with limited access to basic services, food and water.

Northern Bahr El-Ghazal State (in the western part of South Sudan) alone has received some 70,000 southerners, according to the UN Mission in South Sudan. The state currently has the highest rate of poverty in the country, with 76 percent of the population classified as “poor” by South Sudan’s National Bureau of Statistics.

The recently airlifted returnees are relieved to have arrived back in their “homeland” but are anxious about their future, with no guaranteed prospects of land, a job, or government support. Many of them have spent most or all of their lives in the north following a 22-year civil war, and have no known relatives left in the south.

Local authorities have also expressed concern about how these returnees will rebuild their lives in a new country burdened by high levels of unemployment, poverty and inadequate government capacity to assist internally and externally displaced people.

No relatives

“Hundreds of thousands of returnees have been integrating into South Sudan relatively well over the last two years, but those currently stranded do not have the means or family connections to do so,” explains Latio Kudus, head of disaster management at the South Sudan Red Cross.

“We are now very concerned about the remaining returnees who were reluctant to move back to the south due to lack of transport and limited means… It’s still not clear how they will manage,” he added.

The airlifted returnees were taken to Kapuri Transit Camp, 13km west of Juba, where they receive some assistance before continuing their onward journeys; many people remain in Kapuri, waiting for relatives or unsure about where to go.

An airlifted returnee, Elisa Ekanga, spent a year in Kosti, “Life was very hard for us in Kosti… We had hardly any access to food and I never thought we would get out… I am relieved to be here, but anxious about my future… I am from the Torit area, but have no relatives left there. We have not been told we have land or tools to cultivate,” she added.

“I’m still waiting for my husband and possessions… which could take weeks or months, but still don’t know how we will survive when we leave the camp.”

Limited land

The government of South Sudan only owns a limited amount of land in the country following the Sudan Peoples’ Liberation Movement (SPLM) decision in 2005 to hand the land back to the people. It is now facing the time-consuming and challenging task of negotiating with host communities. It was hoped most returnees would go to rural areas and take up farming, but the vast majority are now expected to settle in urban areas, spurring the growth of slums and taxing public services.

“Many of these people have lived their lives on the move as a result of war. They are resilient and can adapt easily, but will also need more support,” explained a South Sudan Red Cross volunteer working at Kapuri Transit Camp.

However, overstretched humanitarian agencies are shifting their efforts and resources to the ongoing refugee crisis in the border regions. Some 160,000 Sudanese refugees have moved into South Sudan in recent months as a result of conflict and food insecurity.

To fill this humanitarian assistance gap, the South Sudan Red Cross is providing basic support to returnees at a series of transit sites, helping with such things as tracing family members, emergency first aid, nutritional screening and immunizations. It is also assessing the needs of returnees.

The movements of refugees, returnees and internally displaced persons are proving to be a major challenge to South Sudan and its humanitarian partners.

IRIN NEWS

tl/cb

Share

After Independence, What Next for South Sudan?

Building a new nation amidst dire poverty and the scars of war

By Peter Martell, Juba

UN African Renewal

With a roaring cheer the people of South Sudan welcomed the newest nation in the world. A sea of people waved flags in a blur of colour as the south’s flag was hoisted high into the air on 9 July, marking the historic moment of formal independence from former civil war enemies in the north. Couples embraced and men cried as the new national anthem was sung for the first time ever.

“Today is the most important day for the people of South Sudan, the proclamation of whose birth and emergence as a member of the community of world nations you have just witnessed,” said President Salva Kiir, speaking in front of a giant crowd. “It is a day which will be forever engraved on our hearts and minds.… We have waited 56 years for this day. It is a dream that has come true.”

But the party is over, and now the hard work begins. “Let us celebrate today, but we must get to work right away,” President Kiir added. Achieving that dream will be no easy task. The new nation, an area about the size of Spain and Portugal combined, is left in ruins by decades of war.

“We have suffered so much over many long years of fighting,” said former child soldier turned student Mabior David. “Our baby nation has a long way to go,” he added. “But if we can be left in peace, I’m hopeful we will manage.”

Challenges

Sudan’s wars were the longest running conflict in Africa: two rounds of civil war spanning nearly 40 years, fought over ideology, religion, ethnicity, resources, land and oil. The last round, from 1983 to 2005, left some 2 million people dead and 4 million displaced from their homes.

Some in the south fought for separation. Others wanted Sudan to remain united, aiming to change a ruling regime in Khartoum that they said marginalized the majority. But the rebels also fought amongst themselves, in bitter internecine battles as bloody and as bitter as those fought against government forces.

A referendum on independence was set as part of a 2005 peace deal. When it came this January, almost 99 per cent of southerners who voted in the poll chose to split Africa’s largest country into two.

Southerners hope that the wars are now over. But formal independence will not solve overnight the massive problems left by such a long war.

“There are enormous expectations, but also enormous challenges ahead,” said Joe Feeney, who heads the UN Development Programme in South Sudan. “The people of South Sudan have suffered enormously. [The war] left a scar that is not only physical, in the infrastructure, but a scar has been left on the people.”

Six nations share a border with South Sudan, which has fewer than 100 kilometres of tarmac roads. “The vast majority of the country remains inaccessible during the rainy season,” added Mr. Feeney. “Jonglei state, just one of the 10 states in the south, is twice the size of my country, Ireland, and it has no paved roads.”

Statistics are shocking. South Sudan has lucrative oil reserves, but remains one of the most impoverished and least developed countries in the world. The UN’s World Food Programme said it helped feed about half the population last year, or some 4 million people.

The UN issues a list of “scary statistics” for visiting journalists: South Sudan has the lowest routine immunization coverage rate in the world. A 15-year-old girl has a higher chance of dying in childbirth than completing school. One out of seven women who become pregnant in the south will probably die from pregnancy-related causes.

Away from the celebrations in the capital, Juba, people had little time to party for independence. Much of their lives are taken up with day-to-day survival. “The acid test of success will be what changes the people out in the states will see in their lives as a result of independence,” Mr. Feeney said.

“All of Sudan, not just the south, will face major challenges,” warns Oxfam, the UK-based aid agency. “It will need long-term support from the international community if there is to be lasting peace and development.”

In Africa's newest — and one of its poorest — nations, one out of seven women dies from pregnancy-related causes. UN Photo / Fred Noy

Trappings of a state

Football and basketball teams have been made, passports ordered, a national anthem written and sung. “Having our own team play under the South Sudanese flag is something we have waited for,” says Rudolf Andrea, secretary of the South Sudan Football Association. “It is something I never thought would be possible, to show the world we are truly a new nation.”

But creating a viable nation will take more work than the symbolic trappings of state alone. The introduction of a new separate currency for the south is just one step, with other major hurdles ahead for the fledgling economy.

Key to the success of the south will be how the government negotiates with those who still threaten the new country, from outside and within. Ethnic rivalries between multiple groups are exasperated by bitter enmities dating from the war. In the past, the north exploited rivalries by backing splinter militias distrustful of the mainstream southern leadership.

Most of the south pulled together during the war in opposition to forces from the north. But now that separation has taken place, the south must unite and find new bonds and create a nation based on a shared identity.

“Is this nation going to be an inclusive nation?” asked Jok Madut Jok, a South Sudanese academic working in the culture ministry, who is also a history professor at Loyola Marymount University in the US state of California. “Or is it going to exercise the double standard that other countries have gone in for — that you become independent and then go ahead and do the exact things that you had rebelled against?”

Ensuring economic growth

Over 2 million southerners have returned home since the 2005 peace agreement was signed. But a new wave of tens of thousands of families are now travelling from the north to south. Over 300,000 people have returned home since last October, with many more expected still to come.

“We have returned home because we had to leave the north, because our jobs were terminated,” said former civil service official Giir Thiik, who spent four weeks on a slow barge to Juba. “There is nothing here for me to do, and my money is little. I’m glad to be back in the south, but truthfully, it is a shock.”

Building an economy to construct the new nation and provide jobs will put huge pressure on the government. Up to now, many services have been provided by aid agencies and international partners.

The government budget is based almost entirely on oil revenues, as much as 98 per cent in recent years. But there is also other economic potential. The south is believed to hold large mineral and metal deposits. It has vast areas of potential farmland, forestry and even hydroelectric power from the White Nile River.

But change must reach the people on the streets and in the villages. “We just want to be able to work and make a life for ourselves,” says Mary Okech, a widow with six children, who collects rubbish. “The problems are that there are not good jobs for us, and I don’t have the money to make a business on my own. I need help for that.”

Violence

Stabilizing peace also remains a real concern. The final steps towards Sudan’s divorce have been far from easy. Key deals remain to be struck on a variety of issues: sharing the oil proceeds, dividing the US$35 billion debt and demarcating the borders. Both countries have introduced new currencies, a process that is likely to add complications to their struggling and poorly managed economies.

Despite a peaceful referendum for the south, tensions remain high with the north, after months of violence in the border areas. In May, northern troops took over the contested Abyei region, forcing over 110,000 people to flee into the south. Both north and south claim the flashpoint region of grasslands and farms about the size of Lebanon as theirs. A referendum to determine where it will belong has been blocked, and remains a source of tension between the two sides.

A deal has been struck for northern troops to pull out and Ethiopian peacekeepers to replace them. But that deal still does not provide any means for a long-term peaceful solution.

Then in June violence broke out in the northern oil state of Southern Kordofan, between the northern military and former members of the ex-rebel Sudan People’s Liberation Army, now the official southern army. The north claims the fighters there are backed by the south, just as the south accuses the north of backing rebels in its territory to destabilize key oil areas along the still undefined north-south border.

Each side rejects the other’s accusations. But analysts say they fear there will be no swift solution to the conflict along the border.

Countdown to South Sudan’s independence

  • 1820Egyptian army under Ottoman Turks invade Sudan, the south’s official start date of the “191-year struggle.”
  • 1955Torit Mutiny against British colonial rule, followed by an intermittent bush war.
  • 1 January 1956Independence of Sudan.
  • 1963Southern separatist Anyanya rebels step up attacks.
  • 1972Peace agreement signed between  Khartoum and Anyanya rebels, giving the south limited autonomy; but the agreement swiftly crumbles.
  • 1983Southern army officers rebel in Bor, forming the Sudan People’s Liberation Army and sparking the start of the second civil war.
  • 9 January 2005Comprehensive Peace Agreement signed to end 21 years of war.
  • 9 January 2011Week-long South Sudan independence referendum held.
  • 7 February 2011Final results released: almost 99 per cent vote for separation.
  • 9 July 2011Independence of South Sudan proclaimed.
Share

Fighting Malaria With Nets Nets, Mandy Moore

Mandy Moore
Singer-songwriter, actress and PSI Ambassador
Mandy Moore, Singer-songwriter, actress and PSI Ambassador

I’m extremely grateful to be invited to share my voice alongside all these incredible women on International Women’s Day. As an ambassador for the global health organization PSI (Population Services International), I’ve been fortunate to have traveled to places like the Central African Republic and Southern Sudan where I have met amazing women who rival the likes of the women on this site today.

Last fall, I traveled to the Central African Republic — a country where malaria is responsible for approximately half of all hospital visits. I was there to help launch a United Nations Foundation’s Nothing But Nets campaign that would provide a net to every family in need in the country.

As part of the trip, I visited a local health clinic in a rural part of the capital city, Bangui. There, I met a woman named Sophie who was with her husband and newborn baby. Her baby was inconsolable, crying from pain and hot to touch with a high fever. This was the second time Sophie had been at the clinic with her daughter. The first time her daughter she was only mildly ill, but the health clinic didn’t have any anti-malaria treatment in stock. So they referred her to the local hospital, which was an expensive bus ride away. When Sophie arrived at the hospital she realized that they couldn’t afford the medication. So she took the little remaining money she had and purchased syringes. Then she walked back to the rural health clinic and begged the doctor there to give them the medication for free. Sophie was willing to inject her daughter herself if she thought it could save her life.

Mandy Moore in the Central African Republic

That’s when I met them. The health clinic had no medication, Sophie had no money, and her daughter’s fever was worsening by the minute. Luckily, in her case, we were able to give her the money needed to return to the hospital by cab and purchase the right treatments.

That was the last time I saw Sophie and her baby. I often think of them and hope that they’re okay. But I can’t help but wonder what will happen the next time her daughter is bitten by a malaria-carrying mosquito, when there’s no group of Westerners at the clinic willing to pay her way.

Thankfully, there’s hope for mothers like her. Long-lasting, insecticide-treated mosquito nets are one of the most cost-effective and cost-efficient ways of preventing malaria. Nets can prevent malaria transmission by up to 90 percent, and through the Nothing But Nets campaign that I helped launch, the government of Central African Republic and its partners at PSI and UNICEF were able to distribute nearly 1 million mosquito nets — one for every family in need.

At the same time, thanks to a grant from the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, the local health clinic where I met Sophie is now able to provide preventative malaria treatment to pregnant women, free of charge. Malaria contributes to the deaths of an estimated 10,000 pregnant women and 200,000 infants each year in Africa, so early and effective treatment can prevent a great majority of deaths.

But tackling malaria in a country like the Central African Republic is a huge uphill battle, and my experiences there have been a healthy dose of reality, fueling my own sense of urgency to do my part in reducing the preventable suffering of the incredible women I met. This year, I will be attending the Clinton Global Initiative University, a meeting for students and national youth organizations to tackle pressing global issues. I am excited about being a part of this growing community of young leaders who don’t just discuss the world’s challenges, but take real, concrete steps toward solving them — real, concrete steps to empower women like Sophie to protect herself and her family.

[ad#Adsense-200by200sq]

Share

George Clooney Gives Malaria Hollywood Buzz

Clooney contracted malaria while in Sudan to monitor the election

George Clooney is used to creating a buzz no matter where he goes. However, on a recent trip to Sudan he experienced a buzz he could have done without.

‘I was so sick with malaria, I didn’t care if I lived or died’

The Hollywood heartthrob was bitten by a mosquito and contracted malaria while in Africa working on his Enough project, in a bid to put an end to genocide.

“I guess the mosquito in Juba looked at me and thought I was the bar,” he quipped. But while Clooney ironically joked catching malaria “was good fun” the disease is deadly and often fatal. In fact, it is the fifth-leading cause of death around the world, according to the US-based Centre For Disease Control And Prevention.

The 49-year-old is not the first celebrity to pick up malaria. Chelsea footballer Didier Drogba recently fell foul of the disease when in the Ivory Coast, while Cheryl Cole contracted it on a trip to Tanzania. The Girls Aloud singer and X Factor star was originally misdiagnosed and ended up in hospital after collapsing on a shoot.

“I am pretty much evangelised now when it comes to warning people of the dangers of malaria,” says Joe Kearns from Dublin, who picked up the disease while working for Concern in Ethiopia.

Like Cheryl Cole, Kearns was also misdiagnosed and ended up in hospital in a critical condition.

“The first thing is it feels very like a flu,” he says. “You get aches and pains in your bones and you have a temperature and you feel crap. It was almost two years since I had come home from the zone that had malaria so it didn’t trigger any alarm bells.”

While the symptoms usually take a period of between two weeks and several months to appear, in extreme cases can appear up to 30-40 years later.

“I went into hospital and they sent me home with no idea what was wrong with me,” says Kearns. “I was getting sicker and sicker and after about 10 days I was hospitalised again. My wife was told they didn’t think I would live. I had had three blood transfusions, I was unable to eat and I weighed 8.5 stone – I normally weigh about 11 stone. I was so sick I actually didn’t care whether I lived or died.”

Luckily, his brother, a doctor, had a tissue sample sent to the Tropical Medicine Clinic in the Lourdes Hospital in Drogheda after recalling Joe had been in Africa. That is when he was finally diagnosed as suffering from malaria.

“Basically speaking, Irish-trained doctors are not sufficiently trained in considering tropical medicine in their consultations, and that’s the same whether they are GPs or a hospital doctor,” says Dr Graham Fry, Medical Director at the Tropical Medical Bureau. “It takes an exceptional doctor to consider outside a box and consider a person’s geographical history.”

The symptoms of the mosquito-born infectious disease, widespread in parts of the Americas, Asia and Africa, include fever and headache, but in severe cases can lead to hallucinations, coma and death.

Indeed, former No Frontiers presenter Kathryn Thomas experienced “hellish visions” and couldn’t feel her legs after catching malaria while filming an adventure special in Papua New Guinea.

But just like George Clooney, Cheryl Cole, Kathryn Thomas and many others who catch the disease, Joe Kearns had taken what he thought were the proper precautions.

“I went out to Africa for two years and beforehand got a lot of medical advice from Concern,” he says. “We were told to take tablets while we were there and I was very diligent about making sure I took my tablets. I was not sick at all with malaria when I was in Africa. But the tablets don’t guarantee that you won’t get it, as in my case. The only way to be sure you don’t get it is to ensure you don’t get bitten. If you take the tablets you are improving your chances but it is only improving your chances.”

In fact, according to Dr Fry of the Tropical Medical Bureau, tablets only offer 95% protection.

In Africa, it is estimated that two children die from malaria every minute. Every year there are about 250 million malaria cases and nearly one million deaths, according to the World Health Organisation. But malaria is also a growing phenomenon in Ireland.

The National Surveillance Centre report on Notifiable Diseases issued earlier this year shows 82 reported cases of malaria in 2010 in comparison to 90 cases for the previous 12 months.

“Up until four or five years ago there was only about 20 cases every year in Ireland,” says Dr Fry. “However, over the last five years that has shot up into the 80s and 90s.

“Over half of these are from people who have come to live in Ireland over the last 10 years from Africa. They have had a couple of children they have settled in to Ireland and they now want to go back to their home country in West Africa to visit family and friends.

“They don’t think they are going to be at risk because they are going home, but they are not. Ireland is now their home so they have lost the antibodies that protect them.”

With the numbers of malaria cases on the rise, the Tropical Medical Bureau is urging Irish travellers to be more cautious and to acquire the appropriate vaccinations before travelling to malaria-prone areas.

“I don’t think Irish people are aware of the risks,” says Dr Fry. “Reading about George Clooney or Cheryl Cole people think they must have done something really odd and it is never going to happen to them. People never think it is going to happen to them, because it always happen to someone else.”

George Clooney and Cheryl Cole also probably thought it always happens to someone else, but like an increasing number of people they were wrong. Luckily for them the disease was diagnosed early enough before they ended up being dead wrong. – Irish Independent

Share

Anti-Genocide Paparazzi Watching Sudan from Above

Clooney's Anti-genocide paparazzi will watch Sudan from Above
Clooney's Anti-genocide paparazzi will watch Sudan from Above

As reported last week, American actor George Clooney and a group he formed is joining forces with Google, a U.N. agency and anti-genocide organizations to launch a satellite surveillance of the border between north and south Sudan to try to prevent a new civil war during the south’s scheduled elections on January 11, 2011..

The Satellite Sentinel Project — a joint experiment by the U.N.’s Operational Satellite Applications Program, Harvard University, the Enough Project and Clooney’s posse of Hollywood funders — will hire private satellites to monitor troop movements starting with the oil-rich region of Abyei.  Sentinel is launching with $750,000 in seed money from Not On Our Watch, the human rights organization Clooney founded along with Don Cheadle, Matt Damon, Brad Pitt, David Pressman and Jerry Weintraub.

The satellite data will point out movements of troops, civilians and other signs of impending conflict. Images collected by the satellite will be scrutinized and made public at www.satsentinel.org within 24 hours of an event to remind the leaders of northern and southern Sudan that they are being watched.

I am excited that the situation in Sudan is receiving such celebrity attention. The world was just too quiet on Dafur, almost caught sleeping on Rwanda, and didn’t care much about Liberia and Sierra Leone.

Mr. Clooney has continually warned that genocide in Sudan should not happen on our watch.

Share

Clooney, Google, UN Team Up To Watch Sudan Border

Matthew Lee

A group founded by American actor George Clooney said Tuesday it has teamed up with Google, a U.N. agency and anti-genocide organizations to launch satellite surveillance of the border between north and south Sudan to try to prevent a new civil war after the south votes in a secession referendum next month.

Clooney’s Not On Our Watch is funding the start-up phase Satellite Sentinel Project that will collect real-time satellite imagery and combine it with field analysis from the Enough Project and the Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, organizers said.

The data will point out movements of troops, civilians and other signs of impending conflict. The U.N. Operational Satellite Applications Program and Google will then publish the findings online.

“We want to let potential perpetrators of genocide and other war crimes know that we’re watching, the world is watching,” Clooney said in a statement. “War criminals thrive in the dark. It’s a lot harder to commit mass atrocities in the glare of the media spotlight.”

The groups hope that early warnings will reduce the risk of violence.

Southern Sudan’s looming Jan. 9 independence referendum has raised fears of renewed north-south civil war. The vote is the result of a 2005 peace deal that ended a 21-year conflict that claimed the lives of two million people and left twice as many displaced.

Organizers said the Satellite Sentinel Project will be available online Wednesday at . http://www.satsentinel.org

Share

Sudan vote a test for all Africa

On January 9, the people of south Sudan will vote in a referendum to decide whether they will remain part of a united Sudan or form a new independent state
On January 9, the people of south Sudan will vote in a referendum to decide whether they will remain part of a united Sudan or form a new independent state
Thabo Mbeki

The entire continent is watching to see if diverse communities can live in peaceful mutual respect.

IT HAS been said, correctly, that Sudan is a microcosm of Africa. For this reason, the entire continent will follow events in Sudan over the next few months with the greatest interest.

On January 9, the people of south Sudan will vote in a referendum to decide whether they will remain part of a united Sudan or form a new independent state. If they choose the latter option, the new state will come into being in July.

During the same period, even as Sudan is addressing the issue of its north-south relations, it will also have to arrive at a comprehensive agreement to end the conflict in Darfur.

During its nearly 55 years of independence, Sudan has experienced a succession of violent conflicts, in the south, the west (Darfur) and the east. It is commonly accepted that what lay at the root of these conflicts was the failure of independent Sudan – one of Africa’s most racially, ethnically, religiously and culturally diverse countries – to construct a polity informed by the principle and practice of unity in diversity.

This challenge faces almost all African countries as they seek to construct stable and peaceful societies. Nearly all civil wars and other violent conflicts in post-colonial Africa have occurred because of the failure to manage properly the diversity that characterises these countries.

These conflicts have taught Africa that, in order to contain the centrifugal pressures that encourage fragmentation within our relatively new states, a conscious effort must be made to nurture and entrench national unity, which must include democratic practices. Conflict has also communicated the unequivocal message that unity cannot be secured and maintained by force alone.

Rather, it is only by respecting our diversity – ensuring that each social group enjoys a shared sense of belonging rather than feeling marginalised and excluded – that the state’s unity and peace can be guaranteed.

Sudan has learnt these lessons through harsh practical experience, including war.

As long ago as 1975, Gafaar al-Nimeiry, Sudan’s military head of state, stated with great prescience what Sudan and Africa needed to do to achieve peace and stability. “Unity based on diversity has become the essence and the raison d’etre of the political and national entity of many an emerging African country today. We take pride in that the Sudan of the Revolution has become the exemplary essence of this new hope. The Sudan is the biggest country in Africa. It lies in its heart and at its crossroads. Its extensive territory borders [nine] African countries. Common frontiers mean common ethnic origins, common cultures and shared ways of life and environmental conditions. Trouble in the Sudan would, by necessity, spill over its frontiers, and vice versa. A turbulent and unstable Sudan would not therefore be a catalyst of peace and stability in Africa, and vice versa.”

Unfortunately, failure to implement policies based on genuine respect for this perspective plunged Sudan into its second costly north-south war, fuelled the violent conflicts in western and eastern Sudan, and created the possibility of the south’s secession. Given this history, it is clear that the governments of Sudan and south Sudan, as well as the overwhelming majority of the Sudanese people, have had enough of war and passionately desire peace.

The processes in which the Sudanese parties are currently engaged – the preparations for the south Sudan referendum, negotiations on post-referendum arrangements, and the search for a negotiated settlement in Darfur – are all informed by this desire for peace. For this reason, Africa is following Sudan’s evolution with intense interest – and is eager to see this country “at the heart and crossroads of Africa” give substance to al-Nimeiry’s vision.

But, regardless of the outcome of the south Sudan referendum, the impending developments in Sudan will result in important changes to the structure of the Sudanese state. In this context, the Sudanese parties – north and south – have accepted the important principle of establishing “two viable states” if the south secedes.

As happens during periods of major and rapid change, the country will experience social tension, uncertainty and unease. Africa is keen that the Sudanese leadership co-operate effectively to manage this delicate situation, in the interest of the continent as a whole. This requires that Sudan’s various leadership collectives have sufficient strength and cohesion to bring their constituencies into the settlement, and therefore that no one, from near or afar, does anything to weaken any of these collectives.

It is in Africa’s interest to see Sudan’s people living together in peace and co-operating with one another for their mutual benefit – fully respecting one another’s diverse but not mutually exclusive interests, whether they live in one country or two. A Sudan that truly embodied “the exemplary essence” of respect for diversity of which al-Nimeiry spoke would serve as a catalyst for peace and stability on our continent.

It is to be hoped that the sustained and enormous international focus on Sudan has as its objective providing the necessary support to the Sudanese people to help them achieve this goal, including building two viable states, as may be necessary.

Thabo Mbeki, a former president of South Africa, is chairman of the African Union High Level Implementation Panel for Sudan.

Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2010.

Share