Why is it Incorrect to be Politically Correct?

By William Manful

Time changes so do people. Maybe people change that’s why time changes or is it the other way round time rather changes people. Either way the world clearly isn’t the way it was.  Consciousness of cultural sensibilities and fear of distressing groups emotionally means that one couches comments or views with care and utmost discretion. Satirists are now having a nightmare, struggling to balance the politically correct with that which is considered or regarded as humorous and funny.

When and how did we become so sensitive? The even bigger question is, is it healthy for society to be so self aware? What will this all mean to freedom of expression which is a cardinal feature of democratic governance? The paradox I see is that the quest to frame society along the lines of tolerance and understanding is becoming a premise for intolerance and discrimination. Views and opinions are now suppressed and stocked underneath diplomatic vocabulary that belie how people are truly feeling. Sentiments are repressed just so that conservatives can fit in, or score political points or appear more modern, trendy, educated, erudite and civilized. Marginalizing a group makes us seem archaic accepting same group accentuates a modern mindset. Meanwhile the anonymity of the internet affords users the chance to be truthful, exhibiting mean comments that emphasize hate, racism, prejudice and ignorance. The vitriol that has been veiled by the veneer of political correctness is unleashed with limitless ferocity demonstrating a backwardness that makes the post modern man look like a caveman. If political correctness is an attempt to enhance the notion of civility amongst men then clearly it is not working.

The world now exists in two as it always has anyway. It is just that the duality has taken a new form; the extreme conservative or the ultra liberal. There is no room for a middle ground. You are one or the other as we continue to develop the penchant to demonize dissent and or disagreement. Is democracy serving us well or is democracy finally proving to be a contradiction in terms? An illusory concept that can never be what it purports to be unless it is wrapped in propaganda.

There is now the risk of building tension by fostering the tenets for freedom which increasingly show that inherent to the democratic political credo are facets of tyranny. The majority may carry the vote but what will that mean to the minority? Conversely the minority may be protected but how is it a democracy when the will of the masses is no longer sacrosanct.

The insanity of modernity is trying to please everyone at once which can only guarantee the outcome of leaving us all dissatisfied for the simple reason that political correctness is a call on humanity to go against its nature. We are better off acknowledging what we truly are by trying to find a balance between the two extremes of correctness. After all the concept of cultural acceptance and propriety are predicated on relativism. The absolute is beyond our range and will forever remain within the province of God.

 

Share

Rehab For Gays And Lesbians Opened in Accra, Ghana

An Accra based man of God is blazing the trail with an innovation which he believes is the antidote to curbing the rapidly emerging trend of homosexuality in the country.

Prophet Dominic Ackah Manlenzie says he has set up what he refers to as a “special solution center for gays and lesbians” at his church to help people who so wish to break the habit.

The founder and General Overseer of Heaven’s Embassy located at SCC junction on the Kasoa-Winneba road, like many other concerned clergy told DAILY GUIDE, homosexuality is the by-product of satanic influence and an abomination to God.

He said to suggest that homosexual tendencies were genetic and therefore natural, is a big mistake. He noted that God created us to be heterosexual in our sexual leanings and desires and that is the more reason why gays and lesbians need divine spiritual intervention to save them from harmful physical and spiritual effects of the practice.

“The truth is that this thing is not from God and I know there are many out there who got themselves entangled in it rather innocently and now want to get out but don’t know how because it has become an addiction very much like smoking or alcoholism. The forces behind homosexuality are powerful so you need a higher power, God’s power to break their hold over the lives of their victims,” Prof Manlenzie said.

The man of God explained the center is manned by himself together with several of his other deliverance ministers and counselors.

“We have had some people referred to us for help through their friends and family and some are now living their lives normally. Some are still in the program. Let me state here that the process to recovery does not always happen at once. It may take days, maybe even weeks or months depending on the individual involved and the unique circumstances and severity of each case. Just like they didn’t hooked on homosexuality in a day, deliverance most likely won’t take place in a day.”

He said after completing the program, participants are counseled to maintain their new healing by keeping a close relationship with God through regular prayer and bible study as well as fellowship with other believers.

They are also cautioned to avoid places and people that could re-trigger their old habits, Prophet Dominic noted saying “when an unclean goes out from a man he will hang around to see whether there are any loopholes he can exploit to gain access into his victim’s life once again (Matt 12:43).

Asked to talk more about the center he said it offers tailor-made prayer, fasting and counseling sessions. He said since he is a prophet, he gives his clients prophetic direction relevant to their situation as well.

“We are careful to take down the client’s family and relationship/sexual history and lead them to Christ if they are not already born again. There is a family, relationship counselor who will talk with them and offer them sound biblical guidance.”

Prophet Manlenzie believes his center will help people get out of homosexuality even if not everyone can be saved. It is not enough to constantly condemn it, he said.

“What pastors, health personnel as well as civil society and government need to do is get on board and actually do something about the problem.”

If you like this article, I’d recommend my book “If I Was Famous, I’d Have a Lot to Say”

Share

How Did Evangelicalism and Tolerance Become Incompatible?

Over the weekend, I was reading a column in the February issue of the magazine Drug Discovery News when I came across  a question which led me to write this article . On page 10 of the magazine, Prof. Peter T. Kissinger, CEO of Prosolia and Professor of Chemistry at Purdue University, asked “How can one be tolerant and evangelical simultaneously”? At first, I thought the question was superfluous and misplaced because I have never thought of evangelicalism and tolerance be to irreconcilable. In fact, I thought of evangelical as the most tolerant among Christian denominations because of their zeal to bring outsiders into the folk. When I was a student at the University of Ghana a few years ago, it was cool to be called an evangelical. The Ghana Fellowship of Evangelical Students (GHAFES) was the organization you would want to be part of to be considered hot and up-to-date. In those days, I thought Evangelicalism was the direct opposite of fundamentalism. Evangelicals were the type of Christians who did not want to appear intolerant or closed-minded.

In the West, especially in the United States, an evangelical is not the most welcome of Christians in some places and Prof. Kissinger’s question got me thinking about this situation. Again, I remember when I was a graduate student at the University of Florida, Gainesville, a friend of mine once suggested the name of the student group Graduate Evangelical Fellowship (GEF) be changed to Graduate Christian Fellowship (GCF) in order to attract newcomers because of the negative connotation the term ‘Evangelical’ carries on campus. I didn’t understand it then, because I had just come from the University of Ghana where being an ‘Evangelical’ was sexy. So when did evangelicalism become synonymous to extreme fundamentalism? The latter is surely taking over the concept of old-time common sense evangelicalism and growing rather surprisingly fast. And it scares me because whatever originates in the US eventually becomes a global fashion and supplants venerable time-honored systems, especially in parts of Africa and other places where sophistication to sift the good from the bad is less than adequate.

Several reasons can be attributed to the deteriorating image of the term ‘Evangelical’ and discussing each of these is surely beyond the scope of this article. I will rather briefly touch on the intrusion of ‘extreme fundamentalism’, often cloaked in the garments of evangelicalism, into politics. As I have written before, politics mixed with religion is always explosive, and can be very destructive. Those of you who follow US politics will have no problem understanding why “Evangelical” carries such a negative stereotype. When media persons and politicians with hazardous and extreme views on important issues of the day are collectively classified as ‘Evangelicals’, then where is the coolness in being an Evangelical? In a society where being adamantly intolerant is equated to being evangelical, defining everything absolutely  based only on one’s views is a perfect description of an evangelical, and giving a simplistic answer to the most complicated question of society is described as the classic evangelical way, we have come just too far.

Why do I care about this? I’m not worried about who calls himself or herself an evangelical. People have the right to call themselves whatever they want. I am afraid of the impact on vulnerable societies, especially those from where I come from. In November of last year, one Ugandan MP, with financial and other support from a fundamentalist Christian organization in the US, proposed the death penalty for suspected gay people.  I mean the death penalty, not jail time. Again, the Prime Minister of Kenya, on Nov 29, 2010, declared a national crackdown on homosexuals and called upon the police to arrest and jail anyone suspected to be a homosexual. It is not the desire to fight what these people see as unhealthy intrusion of western lifestyles that bothers me. What I am afraid of, and you should be worried about also, is when a group from a powerful country such as the US, is allowed to use their financial power and politicians influences to dictate legislation in other countries by bribing gullible politicians. This cannot be labeled Evangelicalism; it is extreme right-wing fundamentalism which should be condemned by all Christians.

Malaria kills a child every 30 seconds, and I think what ‘evangelicals’ need to ask is “What Would Jesus Do?

Share

Freedom, Opportunity and Tolerance

Sitting at less than five metres from the former President of Ghana, John Kufuor, I listened to what turned out to be one of my favourite public lectures in my adult life. The venue was the Rhodes House in Oxford. President Kufuor was still in power then.


Three words summarised his incisive paper: freedom, opportunity and tolerance. He said in a university, individuals were free, they had opportunity to express their ideas, but these must be nurtured with tolerance if progress was to be made.


I have always held a similar view that we proceed to a higher level of consciousness only when we can tolerate other people’s views. This idea of tolerance, or what some social scientists would call ‘toleration’, does not mean jettisoning our independent opinions for those of other folks. What tolerance actually means is that we are broad-minded, open-minded, namely we reconcile our views with those of others.

Freedom to think, act, and make judgements about issues of life is never absolute. But, in one way or the other, we are all, more or less, free, in the highly globalised, opinionated and competitive world.


Opportunity is available, even though it is not always widespread. But if we dig deep, inside of us, we will see modicums and atoms of opportunity, inherent in all of us. What we need most to keep freedom and opportunity afloat is tolerance. We need to reconcile ourselves with others. We need to complain less, and act more. We need to do as Mahatma Ghandi of India did: be the change we wish to see in others. If we all seize opportunity that comes our way, and we cherish our freedom, and respect the freedom of others, within the context of a tolerant global society, the world, not only us, will be better for it.


Let’s go back to some intellectual basis of reconciliation of opposite views and epochal events. Remember Karl Marx, and remember Thomas Kuhn. Karl Marx (1818-1883) argued fervently, that historically, every society is not static, and that after primitive communism comes slavery, then feudalism, then capitalism, then socialism, then classless communism, which he believed will be the result of all former epochs.

What this means is that all historical stages of development are never perfect, and that remnants of them are carried over into a new beginning. For Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996), the writer of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, there is always a Thesis, the reigning paradigm, which then gives away to an Anti-thesis, which in turn gives a way to a resultant outcome called the Synthesis. What this means is that no knowledge is absolute, and that no matter what we know of an issue, there will always be an additional knowledge about it.

This makes us remember the position expressed by the award-winning writer of Half of a Yellow Sun, Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, who passionately spoke about ‘The Danger of a Single Story’ at TED Talks. Please see and hear her out on possibly ted.com or TalkAfrique.com, and you will get more insights of what she meant, and what I am actually talking about.


It is only a dialectic and eclectic approach to issue, or what Dr Nnamdi Azikiwe called the ‘harmony of opposites’ that can enrich our freedom as a people, increase our opportunities as a human race , and in turn, make tolerance a virtue we all can share, we all must share, and we all will share

[ad#Adsense-200by200sq]

Share