Abuse of Painkillers is Epidemic in the United States, Government Reports

Abuse of prescription painkiller have reached “epidemic” levels in the US, a government report says.

Overdoses of pain relievers cause more deaths than heroin and cocaine combined, the report has found.

It says sales and prescriptions of the drugs rose sharply in recent years and this was linked to the rise in overdoses.

Narcotic painkillers are prescribed to relieve chronic pain but the drugs can be “highly addictive”, the report says.

The report, published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), said fatalities caused by narcotic pain relievers have more than tripled in the last 10 years – equivalent to 40 deaths a day.

Last year, a national survey on drug use and health showed that one in 20 Americans over the age of 12 said they had used painkillers for non-medical reasons.

Named as the fastest growing drug problem facing the US, narcotic painkillers are increasingly used recreationally – for the high they cause.

Surging sales

“Almost 5,500 people start to misuse prescription painkillers every day,” said Pamela Hyde, administrator for the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, a federal body.

Sales of the drugs to pharmacies and health care facilities have surged more than 300% since 1999, according to figures from the Drug Enforcement Administration.

But prescriptions of the drug have risen sharply too.

The report says enough medicine was prescribed last year to keep every American adult medicated for one month.

Florida was found to have the highest rate of sales of narcotic painkillers per person, almost three times the rate in Illinois, which had the lowest rate.

Officials believe state health policies can help reverse the trend.

The report recommends tracking prescriptions more carefully and cracking down on “pill mills” (clinics that prescribe drugs inappropriately) and “doctor shopping” (when patients collect prescriptions from several doctors).

“This highlights the importance of states getting policies right on preventing drug abuse,” CDC Thomas Frieden told the Associated Press news agency.

In 2008, almost 15,000 deaths were caused by prescription painkillers, including the death of actor Heath Ledger.

Share

Why are South Africa’s Women Only Just Getting the Attention They Deserve?

Jaymi McCann

Following this week’s coverage of corrective rape in South Africa, I can’t help but ask why it has taken the world’s media so long to catch on?

South Africa features some of the highest numbers of rape in the world and a survey over 2 years ago showed that one in four men freely admit raping at least one woman.

It is also true that the cautionary rule that requires judges to ere on the side of caution when trying a rapist was only abolished in 2007, while the distribution of HIV treatment is still conditional on the victim reporting her attack.

So I ask again. Why has it taken so long for the world’s media to pick up on this?

The progress that this country has achieved in a short time is clearly commendable. They managed a smooth transition from apartheid to democracy with a relative lack of violence. They established a rule of law, democratic elections, a bill of rights, and signed an unprecedented 70 international treaties and agreements in just six years.

From a western perspective South Africa is a shining example of what a successful democracy can look like in a continent fraught with poverty and corruption.

But, it takes more than a lick of paint to cover what are deeply embedded cultural attitudes towards women.

Rape in many areas of society is not treated with the gravitas it deserves. It is considered a normal thing, the result of the natural balance of power between men and women. But by associating rape with an everyday occurrence, the stigma of violence is taken away from it.

Excuses such as ‘she was dressed like a slut’, or ‘she was asking for it’ are all too common. Never mind the mind-boggling idea that rape will turn a lesbian straight, or show her what she is missing.

Technically, rape and sexual assault are outlawed by law. Women’s rights are enshrined in the constitution but evidence shows that enforcement and the implementation of these rights on the ground is shoddy at best.

A 2010 inspection of 430 police stations across the country showed that many were failing to reach fulfil their legal obligations towards women with regard to domestic violence, and a worrying number of police were accused to ignoring, and turning complainants away.

To some, women’s issues are not political. They are seen as private issues, to be dealt with at home. This reduces their importance, reduces the impact that rape can have on a woman. It ignores the fact that rape is not about sex, it is about power and the complete elimination of a human’s right to possess her own sexuality.

Power is the key to reform, both in society and institutionally. Female South African politician Frene Ginwala said, “Politics is about power and women’s liberation is about power. Until we empower women organisationally, we cannot empower ourselves.”

This is what women in South Africa are starting to do. Following the rape of several young girls in Johannesburg due to their ‘disrespectful clothing’ a few years ago, local charities encouraged women to protest. Hoards took to the streets, with placards declaring female independence and in doing so they highlighted the lack of action from the local government and police. The protest forced the government to condemn the action effectively transforming the issue into a political one in the eyes of the public.

Another example is Luleke Sizwe, an organisation fighting against corrective rape, who started an online petition for a change in policy towards the issue. They gained 170,000 signatures in just four months, and are now in discussions with the Justice minister to have law changed so that corrective rape is treated as a hate crime, and therefore punishable by the harshest sentences. They worked with a few volunteers and little media coverage. Without the internet, their cause would have been ignored. These causes are clearly under-reported.

South Africa is a country in progress. Rather than only covering these issues when an alarming survey is published or a foreign national is involved, I would rather that its inspiring people received the publicity they deserve and so desperately need.

Jaymi McCann

laswegian freelance journalist living in London studying the MA in Newspaper Journalism

Follow Jaymi McCann on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Jaymi_McCann

Share

Unites States Troops Playing a Growing Role in Africa’s Military Battles

NAIROBI, Kenya — While putting few U.S. troops at risk, the United States is playing a growing role in Africa’s military battles, using special forces advisers, drones and tens of millions of dollars in military aid to combat a growing and multifaceted security threat.

Once again, the focus is Somalia, the lawless nation that was the site of America’s last large-scale military intervention in Africa in the early 1990s. By the time U.S. forces departed, 44 Army soldiers, Marines and airmen had been killed and dozens more wounded.

This time the United States is playing a less visible role, providing intelligence and training to fight militants across the continent, from Mauritania in the west along the Atlantic coast, to Somalia in the east along the Indian Ocean.

The renewed focus on Africa follows a series of recent and dramatic attacks.

In August, a hard-line Islamist group in Nigeria known as Boko Haram bombed the U.N. headquarters in the capital, Abuja, killing 24 people. A year earlier, militants from the Somali group al-Shabab unleashed twin bombings in Kampala, Uganda, that killed 76. And a Nigerian man tried to blow up an airliner over Detroit on Christmas Day 2009 during a flight that originated from Lagos, Nigeria.

Most worrisome to the United States is al-Shabab, an al-Qaida-linked group in Somalia that has recruited dozens of Americans, most of Somali descent.

“If you ask me what keeps me awake at night, it is the thought of an American passport-holding person who transits through a training camp in Somalia and gets some skill and then finds their way back into the United States to attack Americans,” Gen. Carter Ham, the commander of the U.S. Africa Command, said in Washington this month. “That’s mission failure for us.”

U.S. and European officials also worry that AQIM – an al-Qaida group that operates in the west and north of Africa – is working to establish links with Boko Haram and al-Shabab, the Somali insurgent group.

“I think the security threats emanating from Africa are being taken more seriously than they have been before, and they’re more real,” said Jennifer Cooke, the director of the Africa program at the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies.

The U.S. is conducting counterterrorism training and equipping militaries in countries including Algeria, Burkina Faso, Chad, Mali, Mauritania, Morocco, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal and Tunisia to “preclude terrorists from establishing sanctuaries,” according to the U.S. Africa Command.

In Somalia, the U.S. helps support 9,000 troops from Uganda and Burundi to fight militants in Mogadishu, the Somali capital. In June, the Pentagon moved to send nearly $45 million in military equipment, including four drones, body armor and night-vision and communications gear, for use in the fight against al-Shabab.

The U.S. also announced this month it is sending 100 advisers, most of them special forces, to help direct the fight against the rebel Lord’s Resistance Army in Central Africa and efforts to kill or capture its leader, Joseph Kony, who is wanted by the International Criminal Court. In Libya, U.S. fighter planes helped rebels defeat former dictator Moammar Gadhafi.

In the latest attack against Africa’s militants, Kenya deployed troops this month into southern Somalia to fight al-Shabab insurgents. The U.S. says it is not aiding Kenya’s incursion, but America has given Kenya $24 million in aid this year “to counter terrorists and participate in peacekeeping operations,” the U.S. Embassy said.

The U.S. government “has had a burr under its saddle about Somalia” for years, dating to the 1993 downing of two U.S. helicopters over Mogadishu in a battle that became known as Black Hawk Down, said John Pike of the Globalsecurity.org think tank near Washington. Eighteen U.S. troops were killed.

At that time, Washington had deployed thousands of troops to combat a famine, but the mission escalated into a hunt for warlords.

These days, only a handful of U.S. troops are involved directly in Somalia – special forces troops who enter on kill missions. In 2009, Navy SEALs targeted and killed al-Qaida operative Saleh Ali Saleh Nabhan in a helicopter raid. The Americans jumped out of the helicopters, grabbed Nabhan’s body from his bullet-riddled convoy and flew off. The corpse – like Osama bin Laden’s two years later – was buried at sea.

Pike, who monitors defense issues, said the Pentagon has ramped up operations in Africa tremendously since the time of former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, who didn’t see Africa as being in America’s strategic interest.

“The U.S. has really developed an interest in Africa that we just have never seen before,” Pike said.

“Between all the goings and comings in the Horn of Africa and all this snake-eater (special forces) Sahara stuff … it’s all over the place,” Pike said. “Since I think an awful lot of it is being run out of Special Operations Command and out of (the CIA), I think it probably far larger than anyone imagines.”

U.S. drones launched from the Seychelles islands in the Indian Ocean also provide intelligence, and the pilotless planes are capable of being armed.

Al-Shabab counts 31 American citizens among its ranks, a U.S. official in Washington told The Associated Press. They’re mostly American-Somalis who left the U.S. to join the group. The U.S. official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive intelligence matters, said foreign fighters among al-Shabab’s ranks want to attack Western targets.

Intelligence has revealed sophisticated plans by al-Shabab to attack targets in Europe, the official said, but the operations have been disrupted by the recent stepped-up fighting in Somalia.

Ugandan and Burundian troops fighting al-Shabab militants in Mogadishu as part of an African Union force have pushed back the insurgents in recent months and now control most of the capital. The Kenyan incursion has forced al-Shabab to fight on its southern flank as well.

Though the Kenyan invasion appears to further the U.S. goal of pressuring al-Shabab, U.S. officials say the American military is not providing assistance.

“The United States has supported Kenyan efforts to improve its ability to monitor and control often porous land and maritime borders and territory exploited by terrorists and illicit traffickers, particularly along its border with Somalia,” said Katya Thomas, a spokeswoman at the U.S. Embassy in Nairobi.

But, she added: “The United States did not encourage the Kenyan government to act, nor did Kenya seek our views. We note that Kenya has a right to defend itself against threats to its security and its citizens.”

Some aspects of Kenya’s military adventure appear poorly thought out. Troops moved in just as seasonal rains began and are now bogged down in the mud – a literal reminder of the potential quagmire for countries that intervene in Somalia, whose last nationwide leader was overthrown in 1991.

A paper published by the U.S. Army examining the ill-fated U.S. mission in Somalia in the 1990s concluded that “the chaotic political situation of that unhappy land bogged down U.S. and allied forces in what became, in effect, a poorly organized United Nations nation-building operation.”

It was a 2006 invasion of Somalia by Ethiopia that gave rise to the militants now known as al-Shabab.

“That’s the problem with Somalia, there is just no easy answer,” said Cooke, the analyst. “The problem is so huge and multi-faceted that tackling one aspect of it, i.e., beating back al-Shabab, just can’t fix it. Part of the problem is that the government we have invested in as our key partner in Somalia is a fiction of a government, and so Kenya can try to create some space, but there is nothing to fill that.”

The chairman of the Pentagon’s Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, told the House Armed Services Committee this month that the U.S. must remain active in Africa because terrorists are networked globally.

“One of the places they sit is Pakistan. One of the places they sit is Afghanistan. One of the places they sit is the African continent,” Dempsey said.

________________________________________________________________________

Associated Press reporter Lolita Baldor in Washington contributed to this report.

Share

In Ghana, Stigma Stymies Breast Cancer Prevention

Inter Press Service (IPS), by Paul Carlucci and Henrietta Abayie

(Ghana) — Mary Mingle thought she had a boil on her breast, so she bought some medication and tried to treat it at home. Two months later, bothered by persistent pain, she went to the doctor. There were eleven lumps in her breasts. She had first stage cancer, and her breasts, along with her uterus, would have to be removed.

“The doctor encouraged me,” she says. “The earlier I got them removed, the better. Otherwise, I would lose my life.”

Now, years after her surgery, only five people in her personal life know about her double mastectomy: her three children, her sister, and her husband. She’s been carrying her secret for about 20 years, hiding it from her extended family with a padded bra because she is afraid she will be stigmatised. She also hides it from her church, for the same reason.

“I don’t want them to be aware,” she says, her voice a tiny whisper.

Health officials in Ghana say breast cancer is a growing problem compounded by untrained medical practitioners, a lack of equipment, and unhealthy, sometimes fatal, cultural beliefs.

Historically, breast cancer has received scant attention in this West African country. International donors and institutions have been focused on communicable diseases like malaria and HIV/AIDS. Despite the fact that, according to Ghana Health Services (GHS), non-communicable diseases are the leading causes of death.

“It’s only now that attention is being drawn to it,” says Dr. Kofi Nyarko, head of the GHS cancer control programme.

There aren’t any solid statistics yet. In the capital of Accra, the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, one of two full service cancer facilities in the country, is building an in-hospital registry of cases. In Kumasi, the country’s second biggest city in Ashanti Region, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital is also working on a database.

According to Dr. Verne Vanderpuye, a clinical oncologist at Korle Bu, the hospital gets about 3,000 breast cancer referrals a year.

“The main problem is that people don’t come early,” she says. “In an untreated case, when it’s moved beyond the breast, the average lifespan is one-and-a-half to two years. It will move from the breast, to the lymphs, to the lungs, to the liver, to the bones, and to the brain.”

Nyarko says the hospitals have gathered enough information for officials to know that breast cancer is becoming more prevalent, and its victims are younger and younger.

“It’s no longer a disease for the old,” he adds.

About three years ago, a focus on non-communicable disease began to take shape. In 2008, in collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO), the Ministry of Health set up a national Cancer Steering Committee. The following year, Nyarko became the government’s cancer chief.

Working with WHO, GHS has identified cost effective treatment and detection strategies. Radiology equipment is scarce in Ghana – there are 10 mammogram machines in the whole country, six of which are in private institutions – so there will be a focus on clinical examinations, with mammograms for follow ups. It is a strategy that will require training.

“You need human resources,” Nyarko says. “You need infrastructure. You need certain equipment in place. You need all these things and money for training. The fact that you are a doctor or you are a nurse does not mean you can examine someone and say, ‘You are free (of cancer).’ You need to be trained.”

Nyarko expects a comprehensive national strategy will be launched by the end of the year. In addition to increased clinical examinations, the government would also like to build a full service hospital in Tamale, the biggest city in Ghana’s relatively undeveloped Northern Region.

There is also a big emphasis on prevention and awareness, with a series of posters and leaflets produced in partnership with the Geneva-based Union for International Cancer Control. Aside from promoting exercise and fresh food diets, the campaign is also meant to chip away at Ghana’s cultural oppression of breast cancer victims.

“People think that cancer is a call to death, but we are telling them that cancer can be cured,” Nyarko says. “We are aware that awareness is very low, even amongst the social elite. So we are working on that.”

It is not uncommon for victims to be shunned by their husbands or families. And in a country where women do a good deal of work, both around the house and in markets, husbands are reluctant to lose their wives to months of treatment.

Furthermore, chemotherapy is not covered by health insurance and can cost almost 2,000 dollars in just two weeks.

According to the World Bank, Ghana’s 24 million people live on an average of 1,283 dollars a year. The Jubilee oil find in the country’s Western Region is expected to help push GDP growth to 13.4 per cent in 2011, but there is no guarantee that will influence the average annual income.

“There’s also the fact that you could lose your breast,” says Vanderpuye. “We have a polygamous society, whether we like it or not. They might say you are not a whole woman.”

Like many African countries, Ghana is hugely religious. Many pastors tell their flocks that cancer is a spiritual illness, and that the answer is prayer, not surgery. As a result, some women do not go to the hospital until the tumours have spread. And then they die.

“They say the surgery kills, but they wait so long that the cancer spreads, so it appears surgery kills,” says Gladys Boateng, a breast cancer survivor and the founder of Reach for Recovery.

Civil society groups like Reach for Recovery also play a role in spreading awareness. Formed after Boateng survived her own bout with breast cancer, the group has reached 3,000 sufferers in the past eight years. Survivors give back to the group, visiting women in hospitals and helping with screening missions in remote or rural areas.

But even advocates keep secrets. Boateng will not discuss her husband’s reaction to her ordeal. She just offers a tight smile and declines comment. Nyarko, who has been watching international dollars lean heavily toward infectious diseases, is predicting a continued sea change in donor awareness. He is ready – all he needs are resources.

“It’s just now that there’s an emphasis on non-communicable diseases,” he stresses. “You know the right thing to do. You know the right thing to say. But you do not have the resources.”

Share

Africa’s Most Powerful Woman- Ellen

Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, President of Liberia and Nobel Prize Winner

Monrovia (Liberia) – In about two weeks after she won the prestigious Nobel Peace Prize, Forbes Magazine, one of the most influential business publications in the United States, named President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf of Liberia as the most “powerful woman on the African continent.” The Magazine, in its maiden Africa issue, lists the Liberian leader among 20 women influential women in the continent.

According to the first issue of Forbes Africa Magazine, which went on sale October 1, President Sirleaf tops the list of most powerful African women, with Nigeria’s Finance Minister Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala and Malawi’s Vice President Joyce Banda in second and third place, respectively.

The list includes 11 women from South Africa alone.

The magazine says about its No. 1 pick: “Ellen Johnson Sirleaf was elected in 2005 Liberia’s 24th president and Africa’s first woman president. Prior to her election, she worked for the World Bank and Citibank. She is a member of the prestigious Council of Women Leaders. In October 2010, she signed into law a Freedom of Information bill.”

The parent Forbes Magazine is famous worldwide for its lists, which make headlines, spring surprises and provoke debates. Its Africa edition promises to maintain this rich tradition by researching and creating its own lists.

According to Forbes Africa, its methodology for selecting its Top 20 list involved weighing up the size of the economy, market capitalization of companies or the personal wealth of the candidates, as well as researching Google hits, YouTube appearances, plus Facebook and Twitter followers.

It weighted the findings and ranked the tally to come up with the order of the list.

President Johnson Sirleaf is followed, on the Forbes Africa list by: Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, Minister of Finance of Nigeria; Joyce Banda, Vice President of Malawi; Gill Marcus, Governor, Reserve Bank of South Africa; Joice Mujuru, Vice President of Zimbabwe; Diezani Allison-Madueke, Nigeria’s Minister of Petroleum Resources; Isabel Dos Santos, Angolan Businesswoman; Maria Ramos, CEO of ABSA, a South African subsidiary of British Barclays Bank; Mamphela Ramphele, CEO, Circle Capital Partners, South Africa, and former Director of the World Bank; Linah Mohohlo, Governor, Bank of Botswana; and Nicky-Newton King, Future CEO, Johannesburg Stock Exchange, South Africa.

Also on the Top 20 list are: Wangari Maathai, Nobel Prize Laureate and Founder of the Greenbelt Movement of Kenya, who passed away in September; Siza Mzimela, CEO of South African Airways; Nonkululeko Nyembezi Heita, CEO of ArcelorMittal South Africa; Graça Machel, Chancellor of the University of Cape Town and UNICEF Goodwill Ambassador, South Africa; Pinky Moholi, CEO, Telkom, South Africa; Hynd Bouhia, former Director General, Casablanca Stock Exchange, Morocco; Bridgette Radebe, Chairman, Mmakau Mining, South Africa; Irene Charnley, Non-Executive Director, MTN Group & CEO Smile Telecommunications, South Africa; and Monlha Hlahla, CEO of Airports Company South Africa (ACSA).

The Informer (Liberia)

Share

Africa’s Industrialization Through Green Economic Growth

The green economy may be in the way of Africa’s industrialization even if some of the continent’s industries are still grappling with efficient use of energy issues related to climate change.

These were the conclusions of some of the papers on Structural Transformation and Industrial Policies presented at the African Economic Conference, which went into its second day in Addis Ababa.

Salifou Issoufou and Nama Ouattara, from Universite Paris 11, France, in their paper entitled “Does Green Investment Raise Productivity?” indicated that there were three motivating factors for the green economy on the economic, environmental dimensions. These include an estimated U.S.$50-170 billion per year adaptation cost by the year 2030, the contribution of green investment to reduce carbon emissions, and the ability to address famine and poverty by applying green agricultural methods.

The researchers said that they presented new cross-country evidence on the macroeconomic impacts of green investment. In the study they conducted using various data from 1987-2007 from 46 African countries, they arrived at the conclusion that green investment was detrimental to productivity growth.

“Given the negative impacts of green investment, African countries may have to forgo climate change issues in their quest for industrialization,” the study said. “Overall, African countries should be cautious in their eagerness to adopt green technologies.”

In the paper, which they hoped would further the intellectual and policy discourse about the costs and benefits of the green economy for African countries, that countries may need to address, or continue to address the issues of absorptive capacity, efficiency of investment, structural and cultural gridlocks in order to fully reap the benefits of green investment.

“Energy Use and Sustainable Development: Evidence from the Industrial Sector in Nigeria”, a paper by Fidelis O.Ogwumike and Omo Aregbeyen, from the University of Ibadan, highlighted the case of Nigeria, where they criticized low-level awareness of energy efficiency issues among major Nigerian companies.

Finance for investment in energy efficiency is also not readily available either from retained earnings or bank loans due mainly to the financial crisis, according to the paper.

The presenters made their cases for the adoption of industrial energy efficient technologies and practices in developing countries as well as the introduction of incentives for energy efficiency practices.

African Development Bank

Share

Gaddafi -The Murderous Western Touch

Reason Wafawarova

So now Muammar Gaddafi has died; apparently after being incapacitated by the fire power of US drones and French gunship bombers, and left to face a very primitively ruthless death at the hands of the NATO led rebels.

Jurist Special Guest Columnist and international lawyer Curtis Doebbler has indicated that the killing of Gaddafi was a violation of The Third Geneva Convention on Prisoners of War, was a crime of aggression and also constituted the use of excessive force; in as much as it was a clear violation to the right to life, besides being in violation of Resolution 1973 which sought to protect civilians; not to bomb fleeing people as what happened to Gaddafi’s convoy.

To some Barack Obama has emerged as the number one champion of the West’s anti-terrorism war. Ironically Obama has teamed up with Osama bin Laden’s Al-Qaeda to take over Libya, leading to his drones incapacitating Gaddafi from the air so that his Al-Qaeda allies could summarily execute the defenceless and unarmed Gaddafi and his son, among others.

Obama now commands a remarkably bloody record – killing thousands of civilians in Afghanistan, killing Arch Terrorist Osama bin Laden in Pakistan, arming and backing Al-Qaeda-affiliated Libyan rebels all the way from Benghazi to Sirte, via Tripoli; killing over 50 000 Libyan civilians in the process, grazing down Sirte and Bani Walid so they submit to the Al-Qaeda thugs calling themselves the National Transitional Council; and subsequently getting himself the trophy of Gaddafi’s battered body.

Now the global witch-hunt for terrorists has reached remarkably impressive levels, with Gaddafi’s death eliciting cheers for Obama and his sidekicks from brainwashed and hapless global citizens. It is somehow hard not to cheer the smart and fast speaking Obama even when he is announcing a murder act under his command. The man comes across like a genius.

The brainwashing of the global masses is so deep that a heartless and hell-hailing monster like France’s Nicolas Sarkozy can also boast of admirers. This writer treats the barbaric murder of Gaddafi and all other callous and murderous Western schemes as purely satanic; apparently exposing the maggoty and inherently evil forces behind Western imperialism and white supremacy. No apologies.

The manhunt for Gaddafi was clearly not part of effecting a no fly zone, the pretext by which Western powers entered Libya, ostensibly to protect civilians they baselessly said were about to be wiped out by Gaddafi. The manhunt was undoubtedly orchestrated by the same people who founded and executed slavery on us Africans, the very people who occupied our continent by the power of colonial conquest, the people who brought to humanity two world wars, the people who helped create a murderous Zionist Israel, and the very people who today preside over a predatory imperialistic system.

The whole NATO operation in Libya cannot be separated from the work of those who founded the American constitution, and the so-called American exceptionalism. This is why Hillary Clinton brazenly bragged about her role in ordering the murdering of Gaddafi, declaring with a cruel laugh “We came, we saw, and he died.”

The she-devil could have aptly put it like “We came, we bombed, and he died.” Dear reader, you have to understand the language of this piece in the context of the invasion of a sovereign country that has suffered so much loss of civilian lives at the hands of foreigner aggressors reputed with a murderous history based on racial supremacy.

There are a number of reasons that makes it impossible for this writer to join the celebration over the death of Col Gaddafi, and supporting the man himself is not one of them. Col Gaddafi courted Westerners in the last years of his reign, and the revolution of Zimbabwe was not served well by this rather treacherous behaviour. In fact Gaddafi had as many admirable traits as he had deplorable ones, like supporting liberation movements, while trying the Arabisation scheme in Sudan, or supporting the British-sponsored Idi Amin in Uganda, even when the dictator was waging a war against Tanzania.

He is the same Gaddafi who helped train our own freedom fighters during Zimbabwe’s war for independence, and the same Gaddafi who turned Libya into one of the richest countries on this planet from the second poorest country when he took over power. Talk of 42 years of massive economic progression and tightly controlled political monopoly of power.

The first reason I cannot and will not celebrate the death of Gaddafi is perhaps the fact that I am a cynic and somewhat a political pessimist by nature. Secondly, I hail from an international relations training background, and also from a media background. As such I am what you would charitably call an expert in the knowledge of how brainwashed this world is.

It is not easy to make someone like this writer an easy target of mass deception tactics; often sugar coated in humanitarianism; the rhetoric on democracy, liberties and freedoms; or any of the hoopla around which rivals and enemies of Western politicians are derided and denounced. This writer is a discerner and not only a listener to Western political voices.

The third reason is I am an ideological creation that is allergic to imperialistic values and whatever they are meant to stand for. No sane person from the African continent can admire imperialism. Simply put, I believe monopoly capitalism practised at the expense of weaker nations is a program designed from the depths of hell, and by its very nature it is the number one crime against humanity.

It is imperialism that breeds devil incarnates like Nicolas Sarkozy, and it is imperialism that deceives humanity to the point of elevating such a heartless murderer to the level of a liberator. Dear reader, if your idea of democracy has got anything to do with the actions of NATO in Libya over the last eight months, then this writer has got bad news for you. You are simply confusing sugar-coated imperialistic aggression for democracy and such an error is fatalistic by definition.

If your source of information over Libya has been the BBC “world service” or any of the mainstream Western media, again this writer has bad news for you. You have been lied to, misled, deceived, manipulated, cheated, brainwashed; and you have to work extremely hard to sieve the information so as to differentiate grain from chaff.

As a matter of principle and by the definition of personality this writer did not cheer American forces when they announced they had killed Osama bin Laden, and neither does he cheer them for ending the life of Muammar Gaddafi.

This writer does not count Obama a hero of whatever magnitude, just like it is increasingly becoming hard to keep counting Nicolas Sarkozy among humans.

The man is proving to be simply a heartless beast walking on two legs. His British sidekick David Cameron comes along as a beautiful looking angel from the Devil’s kingdom. Libyan atrocities committed by NATO and its Al-Qaeda allies stink to high heavens, and they speak strongly on the characters of Sarkozy and Cameron. Displaying dead bodies in a shopping centre is something that infuriates the Devil himself, yet these

Allah preaching goons reckon its laudable conduct.

These views are figurative descriptions purely based on intellectual opinion from an angered writer. Let us start with Barack Obama, a man fitting so well into Malcolm X’s “house nigger” description, dutifully doing

Uncle Sam’s dirty work at home and abroad.

It is a fact that Obama has not used his eloquence and oratory skills to say anything tangible about racism in the United States, or about the deplorable conditions of the African American. Africa we are one and together we will overcome. It is homeland or death!

Reason Wafawarova is a political writer based in SYDNEY, Australia.

This is because he is smart enough to know that if he did, the white system he pretends to lead from the White House would bump him off or invent scandals that would make him fall from grace.

As once said by one Rap Brown, violence is as American as cherry pie; just like crime against humanity is as Western as the white skin; only shared by a few others on this planet.

The brutal West that once enslaved, colonised and eliminated entire races in the past has not really changed much. Today we see the same people who enslaved our ancestors, colonised our nations, and nearly eliminated Aboriginal people in Australia and the Amerindians in the United States reincarnated with other forms of racism.

If captured alive, Gaddafi would have been the 14th African person to be charged at the ICC, apart from the Kenyan crew currently under trial. Everyone ever interdicted at this criminal court has been from Africa and this is purely by racial profiling; otherwise Tony Blair, George W. Bush, Donald Rumsfeld and Dickey Cheney would be on trial as well, together with the Israeli brutes that routinely order the killing of Palestinians. It is either the omissions are based on racial profiling or the interdictions themselves are. There is really not much difference either way.

One can only explain Hillary Clinton’s bragging about the barbaric summary execution of Gaddafi as something influenced by the colour bar. It is hard to believe that Clinton would ever celebrate the summary execution of a Caucasian person, however condemned. She would not be the US Secretary of State if American voters thought she could.

It is sad that the same people who created a colour bar in the past have now been reborn as fighters for democracy and liberties – the convenient pretext employed to justify Western military aggression on weaker peoples today.

We are told the whole Libya episode is some noble cause in defence and protection of hapless Libyan civilians threatened by a fleeing Gaddafi; and we are labelled foolish if we choose not believe this kind of nonsense.

NATO bombs Sirte civilians in their thousands in the name of liberating them from Gaddafi, a man they are accused of supporting in blissful ignorance and primitiveness. Sirte has defined for the world how NTC leaders will treat their political opponents – not really different from what they accuse Gaddafi of.

We can safely confirm now that Obama is nothing more than the elevation of a partially black guy in a bid to reverse the waning popularity of the United States. He did not start bombing Libya by choice.

Maybe Sarkozy did. Obama is simply a mannequin in a suit shop. He is a thing being manipulated by men of tested criminality – men with no problems whatsoever when it comes to killing.

This essay would be incomplete without mentioning Jacob Zuma’s culpability in the spilling of Gaddafi’s blood. Zuma voted for the bombing of Libya and he cannot sugar-coat this one in any other way.

It was just a murderous vote. South Africa and the two other African countries that voted for Resolution 1973 could have prevented the required simple majority needed to pass this resolution had they abstained or voted against this resolution. Libya could have been saved.

Now Zuma has the temerity, or is it stupidity to tell the world that he wanted a captured Gaddafi and not a dead one.

Teodoro Obiang Nguema must have his head examined. The man tells us that an African Court would have helped prevent the bombing of Libya, and he says the AU is nothing but a negotiating forum with no power whatsoever to change anything in Africa. What a boofhead for a chairman of the African Union!

The AU could refuse to accommodate the NTC in its structures like is the case with Madagascar right now. The AU could have all voted against the NTC’s attendance at the UN General Assembly and that would have made it very hard for this murderous lot to legitimately take over Libya.

The AU could have condemned the NATO attacks on Libya, called for withdrawal of Western war planes, and with spirited such calls the course of events could have been different.

With such absolute weaklings like Nguema leading African countries, who needs enemies?

And to think the ANC that Zuma leads counts Gaddafi as a martyred hero? And to think this Nguema is in power strictly because Zimbabwe thwarted a coup that would have made him face the fate now faced by Gaddafi. Some people!

Africa we are one and together we will overcome. It is homeland or death!

The views are those of the author and not of TalkAfrique.com

Share

Uganda/Africa: In the Land of Human Sacrifice

Comments: Essay

In and out of Kampala, Uganda’s capital, the City, supposed to radiate enlightenment to some of Uganda’s dark ancient cultural practices, has failed to do so. The City is entrapped in obscurity. “The villages and farming communities that surround Uganda’s capital, Kampala, are gripped by fear.” Human sacrifices, the BBC World TV reports, are on the prowl.  For some time, Kampala is darkened by the denial of child sacrifices. Modern technology, as the BBC investigation aptly used, is helping to track Uganda’s and Africa’s malignity and putting the refutation to shame. Some part of Kampala’s mind has gone into denial and avoidance.
The long evasion has enhanced certain cultural inhibitions that have been stifling Uganda’s and Africa’s progress. This has occurred because Uganda/African elites are intellectually lazy, do not understand themselves, and find it difficult to comprehend their cultural values for answers to their developmental challenges. Where they are supposed to refine cultural issues such as human sacrifices, they are found wanting. Where they are supposed to appropriate the enabling aspects of the culture for progress, they cannot think through.
Dabblers will rather tell you human sacrifices will bring “progress.” That’s wealth and power. What sort of “progress”? If human sacrifices could bring progress, then the elites and their funky associates, with their egomaniacal Big Men swaggers, can grab one million of Africa’s one billion people, mass sacrifice them with juju rituals, and hoo la la, Africa will be the most developed place on earth – with fantastic thinking and reasoning, long life expectancies, superb sanitation and health, sound education, free food and drinks, greater peace, and so on.
The twisted African Big Men involved in human sacrifices see human rights, the rule of law, freedoms, human dignity and enlightenment as not progress. They are allergic to such human advancement; and that make them demean their victims. The children killed for traditional juju rituals are seen as sub-human. But ironically their blood are deemed powerful enough potent to bring power (an African Big Man’s obsession). What a contradiction!
Despite the human sacrifices, Africa is still the poorest region in the world. We talk about this in an age of rising enlightenment, science and technological feats. The attempts by African Big Men to engage in human sacrifices reveal their inability to think well. As key appropriators of this primordial craft, they are still stuck in cavernously dark primeval practices that are counter-productive. This has muddled the African Big Men’s thinking, the notorious “African mentality” unfathomably at work.
Some important part of the African elites’ mind has gone into perennial denial. It shrinks back the African progress. It makes Africa at the mercy of dark forcing. How does a society deal with its leaders who think of killing children for rituals? How can such leaders think well and deal with very challenging developmental issues that need higher thoughts? If the leaders are engaged in murdering children for power, how can they have feelings for the poor, the hungry, the weak, and the marginalized? The leaders loose empathy, a key basis for progress, and for that, they also loose compassion for Africans.
In such a heartless atmosphere, the African Big Men look down upon ordinary Africans; they do not really care about them! Normal Africans are thought of as lambs that can be easily slaughtered for rituals. The African Big Men’s human sacrifices began as an extravagance and ends as a filthy necessity, glued to the murdering of children, other people’s children, and not their children.
In ritually sacrificing Africans, the rot in the African Big Men’s private minds eat away at their public responsibilities. They become ritual murderers for nothing. How can you have leaders who whose private thoughts are dark, evil? If real development is measured by the nature of private thoughts of a society’s leaders, then do not be surprised by what you see in Africa’s development terrain. The leaders’ thoughts aren’t good. The thinking is destructive.

Liberia President Samuel Doe was known to engage in human sacrifices; he projected such dim thinking unto the entire Liberia society, and boom!!! Doe blew Liberia into pieces. Equatorial Guinea’s Francisco Macias Nguema was engaged in human sacrifices of all sorts including burying some of his victims alive with juju rituals. Macias used the knowledge of witchcraft he inherited from his sorcerer father and built a huge collection of human skulls (from the people he has killed) at his farmhouse. Marcia paralyzed his country as a result.

In all these the average African will tell you that surely retribution will occur, and the fate of the African Big Man involved in human sacrifices is disastrous. Doe was short, stripped naked in public, his ears cut off and then brutalized to death, and his dead body thrown into an unmarked grave. Marcia was killed by firing squad.

The African Big Men’s mentality of human sacrifices prevails in zones. Almost all the zones are inhuman. Marcias and Doe were insane. The African Big Men addicted to human sacrifices find it difficult to extricate themselves from. Once involved, there is no turning back. In some parts of Africa, such as Uganda, this has become a mania, driven more by the primitive attempts to play supernatural being. In engaging in human sacrifices for the quick fix of their problems, the African Big Man  want to live a painless life, where all the good stuffs in life are automatically brought by the blood of the children he has ritually sacrificed.
At the centre of the human sacrifices is the clash between irrationality and rationality. The irrational forces are ancient and think more with the superstition part of their brain. The rational forces think more with the objective part of their brain. The “irrationalists,” who look at human sacrifice from within the soul of the African culture, are in the majority. The “rationalists” (or the realists), who gawk at human sacrifices within high morality, humanity, the criminal justice system and locate human sacrifices in the conditions of peoples’ lives, are in minority. The irrational forces win because they have power. As the Uganda human sacrifices issues revealed, African Big Men arm-twist the objectivists (the police, the criminal justice system), hoodwink the justice system and terribly weaken the prosecuting of the perpetrators of human sacrifices to serve as a deterrent to others.
The anti-dote to Africa’s worrying human sacrifices is greater democracy! With its tenets such as the rule of law, human rights, social justice, freedoms, and liberty, democracy will throw greater light into the dark recesses of the African culture and free the African from the predatory Big Man.

Share